Re: New Server?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66350
interpreted = N
texte = My heavily loaded (3-5 megs / sec sustained) Dual 2.8ghz Xeon Dell scored a 267. Less loaded dell box (Approx 1 meg / sec sustained) with a single 2.8 Xeon scored a 275. Dual 3.0ghz Xeon Dell Box with SCSI drives doing about 2 megs / sec sustained scored a 245. Bear in mind these are all running on Red Hat ES 4 which is not a "supported" OS. :) Looks as though the G5s beat the dells mainly in the variable section which is not suprising as that's the code that's not working correctly on the ES 4 boxes. They're clumped together there in the middle of your results page. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: New Server? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: New Server? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  3. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  4. Re: New Server? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  5. Re: New Server? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  6. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  7. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  8. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  9. Re: New Server? ( Phil Herring 2006)
  10. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  11. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  12. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  13. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  14. New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
My heavily loaded (3-5 megs / sec sustained) Dual 2.8ghz Xeon Dell scored a 267. Less loaded dell box (Approx 1 meg / sec sustained) with a single 2.8 Xeon scored a 275. Dual 3.0ghz Xeon Dell Box with SCSI drives doing about 2 megs / sec sustained scored a 245. Bear in mind these are all running on Red Hat ES 4 which is not a "supported" OS. :) Looks as though the G5s beat the dells mainly in the variable section which is not suprising as that's the code that's not working correctly on the ES 4 boxes. They're clumped together there in the middle of your results page. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Limit to Field Length in DB (1998) How Many SKU's is enough? (1997) [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (2012) Search for dates greater than [date] (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) Request for page test (2003) RE: Loss in form (1998) Laying an egg. (1998) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) LetterRip and WebCat (1998) 9 digit zip (2002) Explorer 3.0/ Access Denied! (1997) [OT] Authorizenet Costs (2005) No more misunderstanding ... yay! :) (1997) Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998) form image (2000) WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997) SOP for WebDNA talk (2004) Error: this shopping cart has already been submitted and (2006) Summing fields (1997)