Re: On a related topic
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66657
interpreted = N
texte = We are also running some RH 4.x and Fedora 4.x boxes here and have had g= ood expiriences with it. IF you install them and don't update much! I ma= de the mistake and updated a RH 4.x box which runs Oracle Collaboration = Suite 10g. Bad bad move. Oracle did not run anymore, the box did not res= tart properly. Once up, everyhting was messed up. Noone was able to help= .. In the end I got it running again with downgrading the kernel and rein= stalling Oracle about 100 times.... Anyhow, what does anybody think about running SUSE, in that matter Linux= , on a laptop (workstation)=3F I have done some installations, but don't= think Linux is made for the desktop yet. Nitai -- eContentPark - Enterprise Asset Management System eServices - The complete SupportSuite eSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easy Redakto CMS - Content Management that simply works ComputerOil=AE AG Neugutstrasse 66 8600 D=FCbendorf / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ----- Original Message ----- From: John Peacock [mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com] To: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] Subject: Re: On a related topic > Jesse Proudman wrote: > > What bad experiences did you have with Red Hat=3F We're using RH ES= 4 on > > all our boxes here and have been very successful with it... >=20 > This was years ago and I've never recovered; my therapist is still wor= king > through my childhood... ;-) >=20 > I think it was mostly a philosophical thing; RedHat seemed to be fat a= nd > slow, > with too many services installed by default (though I understand ES is > better > about that). >=20 > Plus they made it hell on wheels to upgrade things outside of their ti= dy > little > framework. For instance, I am likely to want the latest Perl installe= d. >=20 > John >=20 > --=20 > John Peacock > Director of Information Research and Technology > Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group > 4720 Boston Way > Lanham, MD 20706 > 301-459-3366 x.5010 > fax 301-429-5747 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >=20 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
We are also running some RH 4.x and Fedora 4.x boxes here and have had g= ood expiriences with it. IF you install them and don't update much! I ma= de the mistake and updated a RH 4.x box which runs Oracle Collaboration = Suite 10g. Bad bad move. Oracle did not run anymore, the box did not res= tart properly. Once up, everyhting was messed up. Noone was able to help= .. In the end I got it running again with downgrading the kernel and rein= stalling Oracle about 100 times.... Anyhow, what does anybody think about running SUSE, in that matter Linux= , on a laptop (workstation)=3F I have done some installations, but don't= think Linux is made for the desktop yet. Nitai -- eContentPark - Enterprise Asset Management System eServices - The complete SupportSuite eSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easy Redakto CMS - Content Management that simply works ComputerOil=AE AG Neugutstrasse 66 8600 D=FCbendorf / Switzerland Telefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66 info@computeroil.com http://computeroil.com ----- Original Message ----- From: John Peacock [mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com] To: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] Subject: Re: On a related topic > Jesse Proudman wrote: > > What bad experiences did you have with Red Hat=3F We're using RH ES= 4 on > > all our boxes here and have been very successful with it... >=20 > This was years ago and I've never recovered; my therapist is still wor= king > through my childhood... ;-) >=20 > I think it was mostly a philosophical thing; RedHat seemed to be fat a= nd > slow, > with too many services installed by default (though I understand ES is > better > about that). >=20 > Plus they made it hell on wheels to upgrade things outside of their ti= dy > little > framework. For instance, I am likely to want the latest Perl installe= d. >=20 > John >=20 > --=20 > John Peacock > Director of Information Research and Technology > Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group > 4720 Boston Way > Lanham, MD 20706 > 301-459-3366 x.5010 > fax 301-429-5747 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >=20 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
nitai@computeroil.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAweb site) (1998)
credit card authorization question (1997)
TinyStore example templates (1998)
[WebDNA] Page close data (2014)
If search results are blank... (2003)
Problem displaying search result (1997)
Need help with emailer- 2 issues (1997)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Expected Behavior? (1999)
Serving images from databases (1998)
Generating unique SKU from [cart] (1997)
Template Encryption (1998)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Security (2002)
Price lookup problem - was Cart questions (1997)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
emailer (1997)
Exclamation point (1997)
Nested vs conditional (1997)