Re: SQL db type

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67290
interpreted = N
texte = better off to use ODBC don't count on SM to support [sqlconnect] tags -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Jesse Proudman Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:21 PM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: SQL db type To clarify, I meant using the [sqlconnect] tags, not the ODBC tags. On May 25, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Alex McCombie wrote: >>> Does this mean that v 6 will not connect to MSSQL or ORACLE at all? >>> What version does ? >> >> No current version does. -- Jesse Proudman Blue Box Group, LLC p. +1.800.613.4305 x801 e. jesse@blueboxgrp.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to = Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SQL db type ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  2. Re: SQL db type ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  3. Re: SQL db type ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  4. Re: SQL db type ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  5. Re: SQL db type ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  6. Re: SQL db type ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  7. Re: SQL db type ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  8. Re: SQL db type ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  9. Re: SQL db type ( Alex McCombie 2006)
  10. Re: SQL db type ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  11. SQL db type ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
better off to use ODBC don't count on SM to support [SQLconnect] tags -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Jesse Proudman Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:21 PM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: SQL db type To clarify, I meant using the [SQLconnect] tags, not the ODBC tags. On May 25, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Alex McCombie wrote: >>> Does this mean that v 6 will not connect to MSSQL or ORACLE at all? >>> What version does ? >> >> No current version does. -- Jesse Proudman Blue Box Group, LLC p. +1.800.613.4305 x801 e. jesse@blueboxgrp.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to = Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Bess Ho"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Exclamation point (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA on Ubuntu 12.x (2013) Re:need help please (1997) There's a bug in the math context ... (1997) Running a store on BOTH http and https (1998) A dynamic database. (1997) NEVERMIND! New syntax (2000) Submitting ampersands in forms... (1998) Multiple prices (1997) More news on 5.0 (2003) Problem (1997) sendmail doesn't send on Linux (2001) Faxing orders in place of email (1997) Serving images from databases (1998) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) IE drops support (2004) webcat method for waiting specific amount of time? (2000) Basics of tcpconnect (2006) Nested tags count question (1997)