Re: [table] retained in memory

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67669
interpreted = N
texte = Adam Just a thought, do you have WebDNA set up to cache templates ? Stuart Tremain idfk web developments, sydney, australia On 06 Jul 2006, at 1:44 AM, Adam O'Connor wrote: > Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have > discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/ > server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes > in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are > convinced that this context is bad. > > Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, > containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our > server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till > the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we > couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We > replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory > has been stable - thus the problem is fixed. > > Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks > Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning > my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my > fist into your bass mouth. > > -Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  3. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  4. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  5. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  6. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  7. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  8. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  9. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
  10. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  11. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Pat Holliday 2006)
  12. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  13. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Tom Duke" 2006)
  14. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  15. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  16. [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Adam Just a thought, do you have WebDNA set up to cache templates ? Stuart Tremain idfk web developments, sydney, australia On 06 Jul 2006, at 1:44 AM, Adam O'Connor wrote: > Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have > discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/ > server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes > in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are > convinced that this context is bad. > > Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, > containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our > server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till > the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we > couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We > replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory > has been stable - thus the problem is fixed. > > Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks > Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning > my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my > fist into your bass mouth. > > -Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Moment of Thanks (1997) t or f (1997) WebCat 4.0 (2000) Dreamweaver MX (again) (2002) CR's (2003) 2.1.1 bug (ORDERFILE/SHOWIF/LINEITEMS) (1998) Can you do this??? and other stuff (1997) Append command (2000) New public beta available (1997) [WebDNA] passing a variable in an include - precedence (2017) autosensing lanague selection (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Using the sendmail command on CGate Pro (Unix) (2000) rotating thumbnails (1997) emailer on Windows Beta 18 (1997) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) [UPPERCASE] (1997) One more try (1997) NT [delete] (1998)