Re: WC2.0 Memory Requirements
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10261
interpreted = N
texte = >Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM. Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriors Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM. Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriors Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Grant Hulbert
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Summing fields (1997)
[WebDNA] Debian Lenny, Lighttpd and WebDNA FastCGI ... (2010)
Specifying the URL where a user should go (2000)
Alternative To WebDNA? (2006)
primer/tutorial question (2004)
random sorting broken (was Re[2]: php vs WebCatalog) (2000)
email preferences on NT (1997)
emailer (1997)
AE aware WebCatalog.acgi? (1997)
shownext (1997)
Unexpected error (1997)
FAX orders (1996)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
Another webcatalog site!! (1997)
RE: AccountAuthorizer doesn't seem to work (1997)
Still having problems with Authen (1997)
Re:PCS Customer submissions ? (1997)
Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997)
WC Database Format (1997)
Referrer field to header field conversion (1997)