Re: WC2.0 Memory Requirements
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10261
interpreted = N
texte = >Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM.Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriorsPacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMasterSan Diego, CA 92128 |619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM.Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriorsPacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMasterSan Diego, CA 92128 |619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Grant Hulbert
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Field name-subcategory (1997)
Can't load tmpl files (1997)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
[HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997)
Looking for a Quick Solution. (1999)
same bill to and ship to? (1998)
problem: search crashes webstar (1997)
TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
webcat & permissions (1999)
Sendmail Context (2003)
new storefront (2003)
[WebDNA] Digest from talk@webdna.us (2013)
WebDNA and Front Page Extensions (2002)
Upgrading old WebCat Database Files (1997)
Mac: [ListFiles] bug alert (1997)
Security Levels... Possible? (2000)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997)