Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103237
interpreted = N
texte = > Are you going by John now or Govinda? ;-) Both. Govinda since years.. but many new me before as John, and I wanted to alleviate some local recent confusion thus changing my sig files, etc. I feel more of a Govinda, but you can use either :-) > > When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your > live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something > about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits. I always was/am testing in my live setup. The only 'contexts' are: 1) that the code is inside two showifs, one fires when reaching here from a form submission.. the other fires when its var is set to empty string: [showif [URL][submit][/URL]=submit] ...stuff.. [showif [URL][AlertUser2Neglect][/URL]=]  [/showif] [/showif] 2) If you want to try and replicate the issue (please! I mean is it just me?!) , start with a WYSIWYG_syntax page... in there, include another WYSIWYG_syntax file, ...which finally includes a square- bracket style file which has the issue-challenged code in it. - I am used to being maverick, but yeah, it is nerve racking when simultaneously trying to produce production (bill-paying) code ;-) I'm happily game here so long as I have your attention here.. *especially* you guys who now have the fate of webdna in your hands. Even if we are only a handful, if it works, it works. Not to say I don't wish for total success.. just that I gotta start with the code that I am responsible for. BTW, I tried the [redirect] with every possible use of the url= param and [url]-use/placement permutation and combination. This issue is something deeper. P.P.S. the PHP list finally converted me to a bottom poster.. but seems hardly worth the effort to be consistent when even there it is like herding cats. ;-) > > Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long ago > was that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url= > param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years > without > problems. > > I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test > *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and > all... if > you haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the > list > since it is most likely where the problem exists. > > In general, I like your idea of > using the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However, > you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of being > a maverick assumes issues. > > Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYG > syntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because > that > syntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it was > designed for. > > Donovan > > -- > Donovan Brooke > WebDNA Software Corporation > http://www.webdna.us > **[Square Bracket Utopia]** > ------------ John Butler (Govinda) govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Bob Minor 2009)
  15. [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
> Are you going by John now or Govinda? ;-) Both. Govinda since years.. but many new me before as John, and I wanted to alleviate some local recent confusion thus changing my sig files, etc. I feel more of a Govinda, but you can use either :-) > > When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your > live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something > about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits. I always was/am testing in my live setup. The only 'contexts' are: 1) that the code is inside two showifs, one fires when reaching here from a form submission.. the other fires when its var is set to empty string: [showif [url][submit][/URL]=submit] ...stuff.. [showif [url][AlertUser2Neglect][/URL]=] [redirect], or probably [lookup], or I assume even other tags/contexts with [url] inside them)> [/showif] [/showif] 2) If you want to try and replicate the issue (please! I mean is it just me?!) , start with a WYSIWYG_syntax page... in there, include another WYSIWYG_syntax file, ...which finally includes a square- bracket style file which has the issue-challenged code in it. - I am used to being maverick, but yeah, it is nerve racking when simultaneously trying to produce production (bill-paying) code ;-) I'm happily game here so long as I have your attention here.. *especially* you guys who now have the fate of webdna in your hands. Even if we are only a handful, if it works, it works. Not to say I don't wish for total success.. just that I gotta start with the code that I am responsible for. BTW, I tried the [redirect] with every possible use of the url= param and [url]-use/placement permutation and combination. This issue is something deeper. P.P.S. the PHP list finally converted me to a bottom poster.. but seems hardly worth the effort to be consistent when even there it is like herding cats. ;-) > > Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long ago > was that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url= > param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years > without > problems. > > I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test > *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and > all... if > you haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the > list > since it is most likely where the problem exists. > > In general, I like your idea of > using the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However, > you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of being > a maverick assumes issues. > > Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYG > syntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because > that > syntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it was > designed for. > > Donovan > > -- > Donovan Brooke > WebDNA Software Corporation > http://www.webdna.us > **[Square Bracket Utopia]** > ------------ John Butler (Govinda) govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Memory Error message (1998) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Fun with dates (1997) WebDNA for Dummies (2004) [WebDNA] if - combining OR and AND (2008) autosensing lanague selection (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) Greeting Card System (2000) Removing a character (2000) Many $WebCat.exe processes (1998) Understanding variables (1999) [cart]'s ever get recycled? (2000) Pulling Captions from JPGs (2003) [ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997) UPS Online (2004) Updating database (1998) suggestions for a good text editor on windows? (2005) Fun with Dates - revisited (1997) Prices coming up 0.00 (2001) New Line In grep (2003)