Re: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104210
interpreted = N
texte = ----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" USE PHONE, WORDS CANNOT BE TYPED AT OVER, 1,208 WORDS PER =3D MINUTE;;;;;;= ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -----Original Message----- From: Tom Duke To: talk@webdna.us Sent: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 11:29 am Subject: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? Hi all, We have moved most of our sites in the last few days from a Mac server to= a CentOS server. One weird thing is that the order in which emailer proc= esses emails has changed.=20 On the Mac emails are processed by date and time, with new emails being pl= aced at the end of the queue, as you would expect. On the CentOS server= though it seems that emails are processed in a random order, so an email= written to disc later than an existing email in the folder could get sent= before the existing email? Anyone got any idea why this might be happening? Is there something I ca= n do to ensure that emails are sent in the order in which they are written= to disc. Thanks - Tom ----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" USE PHONE, WORDS CANNOT BE= TYPED AT OVER, 1,208 WORDS PER =3D MINUTE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;= ;;;;;;;;;;


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Duke <tom@revolutionaries.ie>
To: talk@webdna.us
Sent: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 11:29 am
Subject: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails?

Hi all,

We have moved most of our sites in the last few days from a Mac serve= r to a CentOS server.  One weird thing is that the order in which ema= iler processes emails has changed.

On the Mac emails are processed by date and time, with new emails bei= ng placed at the end of the queue, as you would expect.   On the Cent= OS server though it seems that emails are processed in  a random orde= r, so an email written to disc later than an existing email in the folder= could get sent before the existing email?

Anyone got any idea why this might be happening?   Is there some= thing I can do to ensure that emails are sent in the order in which they= are written to disc.

Thanks
- Tom
 ----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  2. RE: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? ("Will Starck" 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? (america1007@aol.com 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? (Tom Duke 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  6. [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? (Tom Duke 2009)
----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" USE PHONE, WORDS CANNOT BE TYPED AT OVER, 1,208 WORDS PER =3D MINUTE;;;;;;= ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -----Original Message----- From: Tom Duke To: talk@webdna.us Sent: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 11:29 am Subject: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails? Hi all, We have moved most of our sites in the last few days from a Mac server to= a CentOS server. One weird thing is that the order in which emailer proc= esses emails has changed.=20 On the Mac emails are processed by date and time, with new emails being pl= aced at the end of the queue, as you would expect. On the CentOS server= though it seems that emails are processed in a random order, so an email= written to disc later than an existing email in the folder could get sent= before the existing email? Anyone got any idea why this might be happening? Is there something I ca= n do to ensure that emails are sent in the order in which they are written= to disc. Thanks - Tom ----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" USE PHONE, WORDS CANNOT BE= TYPED AT OVER, 1,208 WORDS PER =3D MINUTE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;= ;;;;;;;;;;


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Duke <tom@revolutionaries.ie>
To: talk@webdna.us
Sent: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 11:29 am
Subject: [WebDNA] Order that emailer sends emails?

Hi all,

We have moved most of our sites in the last few days from a Mac serve= r to a CentOS server.  One weird thing is that the order in which ema= iler processes emails has changed.

On the Mac emails are processed by date and time, with new emails bei= ng placed at the end of the queue, as you would expect.   On the Cent= OS server though it seems that emails are processed in  a random orde= r, so an email written to disc later than an existing email in the folder= could get sent before the existing email?

Anyone got any idea why this might be happening?   Is there some= thing I can do to ensure that emails are sent in the order in which they= are written to disc.

Thanks
- Tom
 ----------MB_8CC4E8B08C2B76C_4AC8_23E29_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com-- america1007@aol.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) This message couldn't reach the list! (multi-column layout ofsearch results) (1998) Happy New Year (2008) [WebDNA] Needing a new host.... (2013) More Applescript (1997) Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997) Custom error files (1998) Universal root for WC errors? (1997) math variable security (2000) WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997) Don't tick me off :) [elaspedtime] (1997) Bannerad Demo (1998) WebDNA 6.0 & MAC OS X Server 10.4.10 (2007) [WebDNA] [Orderfile] problem (2009) UPPERCASE (1997) [defined]ish (1997) RE: Can't get appendfile to work (1997) Is there a 'does not contain' comparison? (1999) expired beta (1997) [redirect] w/o showing args? (1999)