Re: WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10574
interpreted = N
texte = >>From what I've been able to discern, there doesn't seem to be a way to use >>a results template with searches initiated from a hyperlink or search form >>... while using the same results template with searches initiated in the >>[search] context of the results template itself. >> >>Is this correct, or am I being too confusing here? > >That's too confusing. But I think I know what you're saying, and it may >be possible but really I think that where you're headed indicates a >confusing design that may not be the cleanest way to set it up anyway. > >Perhaps you could use an [include] that holds the 'guts' of the search >results page, such as the [foundItems] part, and then have 2 distinct >templates: one for the URL-style search, and another for the >embedded-style search, both of which use the [include] to hold the 'guts' >that are in common between the two. How's that for obfuscating the answer?It's totally clear, and I'm not being sarcastic here, either. I just didn't want to have the same 'guts' in several different template files, because then when I need to change it, I would have to make the same changes to *all* those separate files.Your suggestion is the most practical way for me to proceed, because all I need is one 'guts' file, and then I can [include] it in all the different results templates. Thanks, Grant.Sincerely, Ken ------------------------------------ To leave this talk list send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.com with BODY unsubscribe WebDNA-Talk ------------------------------------
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>From what I've been able to discern, there doesn't seem to be a way to use >>a results template with searches initiated from a hyperlink or search form >>... while using the same results template with searches initiated in the >>
[search] context of the results template itself. >> >>Is this correct, or am I being too confusing here? > >That's too confusing. But I think I know what you're saying, and it may >be possible but really I think that where you're headed indicates a >confusing design that may not be the cleanest way to set it up anyway. > >Perhaps you could use an
[include] that holds the 'guts' of the search >results page, such as the
[founditems] part, and then have 2 distinct >templates: one for the URL-style search, and another for the >embedded-style search, both of which use the
[include] to hold the 'guts' >that are in common between the two. How's that for obfuscating the answer?It's totally clear, and I'm not being sarcastic here, either. I just didn't want to have the same 'guts' in several different template files, because then when I need to change it, I would have to make the same changes to *all* those separate files.Your suggestion is the most practical way for me to proceed, because all I need is one 'guts' file, and then I can
[include] it in all the different results templates. Thanks, Grant.Sincerely, Ken ------------------------------------ To leave this
Talk List send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.com with BODY unsubscribe WebDNA-Talk ------------------------------------
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997)
Snake Bites (1997)
Trailing carriage returns (2002)
Referrer or maybe another way..... (2005)
Digest Version (2000)
multiple product databases (1997)
[numFound] inside [showIf]? (2000)
Search-context (1999)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
[include ...] behavior (1997)
[BoldWords] WebCat.acgib15Mac (1997)
rotating thumbnails (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)
snicker, snicker (1997)
Cart passing in URL... (2004)
This list needs a digest: rant, rave... (1997)
[WebDNA] form data compared to existing database (2016)
emailer cc to figured out (1997)
Remove me from your list (1999)
referrer and no caches (1997)