RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105819
interpreted = N
texte = Christophe- MySQL support would be a welcome addition on my end, as that would allow me to integrate some of my C# apps nicely with WebDNA. Not a show stopper if it doesn't happen, but it sure would be nice... Keep up the good work, WIll -----Original Message----- From: christophe.billiottet@webdna.us [mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:35 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Christophe- MySQL support would be a welcome addition on my end, as that would allow me to integrate some of my C# apps nicely with WebDNA. Not a show stopper if it doesn't happen, but it sure would be nice... Keep up the good work, WIll -----Original Message----- From: christophe.billiottet@webdna.us [mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:35 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
"Will Starck"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
can WC render sites out? (1997)
[include file] wrong path or syntax when using / referingtoo (2002)
spaces in [texta] (1998)
WebCatalog NT (1996)
(2000)
errormessages.db (1997)
Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997)
$adminput doesn't allow [include] files (1997)
[WebDNA] GETCHARS ... words? (2009)
WebDNA 5 - Privacy Issue (Built in sniffer) (2003)
[blank] (2005)
automating txt downloads for conversion to webcat db (2006)
Forbidden CGI Error (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)
Multiple Merchant Accounts? (1997)
can I get formvariables for an include? (1999)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
So many lookers, hey smith micro (2003)
Search bug. Help (2002)
Search returns all, not 20 (1997)