Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105834
interpreted = N
texte = Having enhanced MySQL support would be great for load balancing and my = work with some of the major corps that want SQL data for use outside the = website.=20 I also have some sites using WebDNA data and other sites using the same = data (segments of) on MySQL. Obviously having WebDNA sites and Other = sites using the same data would be great. Backing up of WebDNA db can be problematic when the backup software can = not access the .db file because it is active. I do have two systems = where I would feel far more comfortable if the data was on MySQL housed = on a second server and mirrored. If you plan to expand on the MySQL support, maybe you could also think = about MS-SQL due to the number of corporates that use MS exclusively = (weird but true). Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 28/09/2010, at 10:35 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Good morning everyone! >=20 > this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to = know how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer = using MySQL instead of the internal database system. > As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. >=20 > This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. >=20 > thank you! >=20 > - chris--------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  2. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Dale Therio" 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Brian Fries 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Mr. Robert Minor Jr." 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  6. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Terry Nair" 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  13. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Will Starck" 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  16. [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
Having enhanced MySQL support would be great for load balancing and my = work with some of the major corps that want SQL data for use outside the = website.=20 I also have some sites using WebDNA data and other sites using the same = data (segments of) on MySQL. Obviously having WebDNA sites and Other = sites using the same data would be great. Backing up of WebDNA db can be problematic when the backup software can = not access the .db file because it is active. I do have two systems = where I would feel far more comfortable if the data was on MySQL housed = on a second server and mirrored. If you plan to expand on the MySQL support, maybe you could also think = about MS-SQL due to the number of corporates that use MS exclusively = (weird but true). Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 28/09/2010, at 10:35 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Good morning everyone! >=20 > this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to = know how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer = using MySQL instead of the internal database system. > As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. >=20 > This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. >=20 > thank you! >=20 > - chris--------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Date problems-more (1997) Criticism of WebCatalog: Keep It Coming! (1998) WebCatalog Mac 2.1b3 (1997) Setting up the server (1997) Job in Wash. DC (2000) trouble updating records in database (1998) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Decrypting a user password (2000) Help formatting search results w/ table (1997) convertwords BUG (2002) how to overwrite username and password in the browser? (2000) [WebDNA] How to generate md5 hash on linux (2009) Searching for a search solution (2000) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) SAVECART (1997) Re:Searching for ALL / empty form field (1997) Emailer setup (1997) Re2: frames & carts (1997) webcat restarting script on Linux? (1999) [WriteFile] problems (1997)