Re: [WebDNA] Interesting business model
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106030
interpreted = N
texte = --Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQCContent-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitIt would have been nice to see WebDNA as an option on lots of hosting services over the past 10-15 years or so. I don't see anything special about this one.Much of the software offered by Standing Cloud is in the Fantastico suite, so it's not like they are offering a whole lot of new features. Instead it looks like they want you to pay them to set everything up ... so you won't have to do it yourself. The only problem with this approach is that now you must rely on them to fix things that break, and for mission critical services this puts your company in a position of failing because of their screw-ups rather than your own.Maybe this is why I personally do not like the idea of abstracting hosting services to yet another level. I would rather do things myself if at all possible.Sincerely,Kenneth Grome> Wouldn't it be nice to see WebDNA as an available option?> http://www.standingcloud.com/> > Marc--Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQCContent-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
It would have been nice to see WebDNA as an option on lots of hosting services over the past 10-15 years or so. I don't see anything special about this one.
Much of the software offered by Standing Cloud is in the Fantastico suite, so it's not like they are offering a whole lot of new features. Instead it looks like they want you to pay them to set everything up ... so you won't have to do it yourself.
The only problem with this approach is that now you must rely on them to fix things that break, and for mission critical services this puts your company in a position of failing because of their screw-ups rather than your own.
Maybe this is why I personally do not like the idea of abstracting hosting services to yet another level. I would rather do things myself if at all possible.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> Wouldn't it be nice to see WebDNA as an available option?
> http://www.standingcloud.com/
>
> Marc
--Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQC--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQCContent-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitIt would have been nice to see WebDNA as an option on lots of hosting services over the past 10-15 years or so. I don't see anything special about this one.Much of the software offered by Standing Cloud is in the Fantastico suite, so it's not like they are offering a whole lot of new features. Instead it looks like they want you to pay them to set everything up ... so you won't have to do it yourself. The only problem with this approach is that now you must rely on them to fix things that break, and for mission critical services this puts your company in a position of failing because of their screw-ups rather than your own.Maybe this is why I personally do not like the idea of abstracting hosting services to yet another level. I would rather do things myself if at all possible.Sincerely,Kenneth Grome> Wouldn't it be nice to see WebDNA as an available option?> http://www.standingcloud.com/> > Marc--Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQCContent-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
It would have been nice to see WebDNA as an option on lots of hosting services over the past 10-15 years or so. I don't see anything special about this one.
Much of the software offered by Standing Cloud is in the Fantastico suite, so it's not like they are offering a whole lot of new features. Instead it looks like they want you to pay them to set everything up ... so you won't have to do it yourself.
The only problem with this approach is that now you must rely on them to fix things that break, and for mission critical services this puts your company in a position of failing because of their screw-ups rather than your own.
Maybe this is why I personally do not like the idea of abstracting hosting services to yet another level. I would rather do things myself if at all possible.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> Wouldn't it be nice to see WebDNA as an available option?
> http://www.standingcloud.com/
>
> Marc
--Boundary-01=_pdRANtEv/aVlpQC--
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Claris HomePage messes up the code (1997)
Everyone: List Traffic (was [include ...] behavior) (1997)
[lookup] vs. [search] (1998)
[accountNum] and [math] (1997)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Webcat and logging (1998)
Thanks Grant (1997)
Help name our technology! I found it (1997)
Problems with Price field (1997)
redirect with more than 256 characters (1999)
Why WebDNA is not popular (2002)
WebStar Secure on other machine (1997)
Multiple Pulldowns (1997)
Include vs. lookup? (1998)
Grep vs WebDNA: square brackets (2002)
Sitebuilder / StoreBuilder - *related.db* (2008)
How do I make this faster???? (2000)
Help need to figure this out today!!! Advanced Question. (2004)
Newbie problem blah blah blah (1997)