Re: [WebDNA] Serial numbers and pricing for WebDNA 7.0
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106127
interpreted = N
texte = Just wanted to add two things: one of the possible explanations for the = relative slowness of the website could be because every single word from = each text of each page is compared to a database in order to create = dynamic links: all the links from the websites are in fact created "on = the fly". About the speed differences depending on the days, i am pretty sure it = is a matter of local bandwidth: the server is overpowered with an 8 = cores Niagara processor and the load is always extremely low, less than = 1%, while the available bandwidth server-side is huge. - chris On Jan 23, 2011, at 18:18, Dan Strong wrote: >> So whatever it is I experience sometimes is not the SSL nor the = HTML/graphics.. it is more like the experience one gets when we ask = webdna to do a great big task before returning any HTML. I would have = us check during the next peak load on that server.. what, weekdays, mid = afternoon? Just a total guess. >=20 > -------------------- > The webdna.us site runs on a single main database which is 610k and = has 310 records. There are also four related "helper" databases, but = they are each 1k and have very few records. Stuart Tremain's forum = (graphiteForums), which we use, has around 20 databases with a combined = weight of around 50k. So all told, we're looking at, say, 800k total and = let's just say that many records since I don't want to count them. = Traffic to the site is relatively low. For the past moth, 714 people = looked at 2674 pages. Hence, a "peak time" would be a pretty light load = on the server. >=20 > So, I would call webdna.us a fairly low-impact site currently -- = needless to say we probably won't need to purchase an accelerator = license from ourselves at least not for now : - ) I hope to = significantly increase traffic to the site through our marketing = efforts. Anyhow, I don't think any slowness experienced on the site is a = result of .dbs or RAM. >=20 > That said, have you ruled out connection issues on your side? When you = do a tracert from yourself to webdna.us do you see any high ms hops = and/or timeouts? >=20 > -Dan >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Just wanted to add two things: one of the possible explanations for the = relative slowness of the website could be because every single word from = each text of each page is compared to a database in order to create = dynamic links: all the links from the websites are in fact created "on = the fly". About the speed differences depending on the days, i am pretty sure it = is a matter of local bandwidth: the server is overpowered with an 8 = cores Niagara processor and the load is always extremely low, less than = 1%, while the available bandwidth server-side is huge. - chris On Jan 23, 2011, at 18:18, Dan Strong wrote: >> So whatever it is I experience sometimes is not the SSL nor the = HTML/graphics.. it is more like the experience one gets when we ask = webdna to do a great big task before returning any HTML. I would have = us check during the next peak load on that server.. what, weekdays, mid = afternoon? Just a total guess. >=20 > -------------------- > The webdna.us site runs on a single main database which is 610k and = has 310 records. There are also four related "helper" databases, but = they are each 1k and have very few records. Stuart Tremain's forum = (graphiteForums), which we use, has around 20 databases with a combined = weight of around 50k. So all told, we're looking at, say, 800k total and = let's just say that many records since I don't want to count them. = Traffic to the site is relatively low. For the past moth, 714 people = looked at 2674 pages. Hence, a "peak time" would be a pretty light load = on the server. >=20 > So, I would call webdna.us a fairly low-impact site currently -- = needless to say we probably won't need to purchase an accelerator = license from ourselves at least not for now : - ) I hope to = significantly increase traffic to the site through our marketing = efforts. Anyhow, I don't think any slowness experienced on the site is a = result of .dbs or RAM. >=20 > That said, have you ruled out connection issues on your side? When you = do a tracert from yourself to webdna.us do you see any high ms hops = and/or timeouts? >=20 > -Dan >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
Help with Repost Data msg from form (1997)
Beta 18 (1997)
Windows-user? (2000)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
dynamic PDF no longer working? (2004)
Re(6): Small Bug: ErrorLog.txt/[FORMVARIABLES]/[ORDERFILE] (1998)
[WebDNA] WebDNA programmers for hire? (2010)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
[OT] Security in general [Was] WebDNA security (2004)
Looking for easy way to back up dbs... (2003)
Suse linux 9.0 AMD64 (2004)
New Command prefs ... (1997)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
[WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (2011)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
UPS Quick Cost Calculator (1997)
[WebDNA] [BULK] ampps.com - let webdna be included (2011)
[WebDNA] Wish list (2010)