Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug!

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106747
interpreted = N
texte = I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Marc Thompson 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Kenneth Grome 2011)
I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

What am I missing (1997) Merging databases (1997) [WebDNA] Listwords and newline (2011) can WC render sites out? (1997) SERIAL NUMBER BEING LOST AGAIN!!! (1999) RAM variables (1997) SetHeader not Working (2006) any idea (2004) REPOST [SUM field=xxxx] (2000) Is setting a basic lineitem in the cart really magic? (2000) Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997) One more time (1997) Problems with Price field (1997) Kaaaaahhhhhhhnnnnnnn! (1997) [ModDate] & [ModTime] ? (1997) Who needs Yoda! (2002) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Using files in an Email broadcast (1999) Upgrading to 4.0 (2000) is sku a REQUIRED field on NT (1997)