Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106991
interpreted = N
texte = >>> [snip] >>>> this: >>>> [math][cart]+1[/math] >>>>=20 >>>> produces: >>>> 1.31108545312375e+16 >>>>=20 >>>> Is there any other way that I can get scientific notation out of = webdna? >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Not for me. What version/platform of WebDNA are you running? >>=20 >>=20 >> version=3D6.0 >> platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel RedHat >=20 >=20 >=20 > I don't remember changing the math context in CICADA, so something is = not right here. I can multiply [cart] by 100 and still not get = scientific notation (*1000 does get there). >=20 > Are you sure [math][cart]+1[/math] gives you the result you are = saying? positive. Just tested again: [math][cart]+1[/math] evaluated to: 1.31110022015198e+16 Anyway, I was asking if any of you guys have seen any *other* way to get = scientific notation out of webdna.. other than by using [math] on a long = number.. *wherever* the number may have come from. Thanks -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)
  7. [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)
>>> [snip] >>>> this: >>>> [math][cart]+1[/math] >>>>=20 >>>> produces: >>>> 1.31108545312375e+16 >>>>=20 >>>> Is there any other way that I can get scientific notation out of = webdna? >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Not for me. What version/platform of WebDNA are you running? >>=20 >>=20 >> version=3D6.0 >> platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel RedHat >=20 >=20 >=20 > I don't remember changing the math context in CICADA, so something is = not right here. I can multiply [cart] by 100 and still not get = scientific notation (*1000 does get there). >=20 > Are you sure [math][cart]+1[/math] gives you the result you are = saying? positive. Just tested again: [math][cart]+1[/math] evaluated to: 1.31110022015198e+16 Anyway, I was asking if any of you guys have seen any *other* way to get = scientific notation out of webdna.. other than by using [math] on a long = number.. *wherever* the number may have come from. Thanks -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Smith Micro SUPPORT? (2000) Showif Error Generated... (2003) FW: 2.01 upgrade problems (1997) PCS Frames (1997) Searching Multiple DBs (1997) Price (2000) WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 - PIXO (1997) [WebDNA] Brian Harrington (2019) WebCat for mass emailings (1997) errormessages.db (1997) Emailer (1997) WebMerchant Q (2000) How to display images? (2002) Associative lookup style? (1997) searchable list archive (1997) anyone interested in doing an open-source WebCatbasedforum? (2002) Formulas.db / Quantity Discount problem (1998) Normalizing Dates and Phone numbers (2000) [WebDNA] Integrating with WP and PHP (2011) creating a 60 fields database (1997)