Re: [WebDNA] Re: exclusivelock

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107025
interpreted = N
texte = > [snip] >=20 >> rather than what you are saying which seems to be that the use of = [exclusivelock] [snip] > might *CAUSE* a deadlock in the case the OP was facing. >>=20 >> Or am I missing something in my understanding in what you, or Grant, = are saying? >=20 >=20 > Where did I say that using [exclusivelock] would cause a deadlock? :-/ >=20 Oh, sorry.. right; you did not say that.. but I just inferred it. Imagine the db was so busy that we could not get an exclusivelock (when = we tried)... then I *assumed* that would cause "deadlock". ..OR that = trying too vigorously (i.e. too often) to access a db currently under = exclusivelock could cause "deadlock".=20 No? =20 (Maybe I do not understand what deadlock even means?) =20 Grant was addressing the OP's deadlock issue.. suggesting it was caused = by antivirus software on Windows grabbing it's infamous exclusivelock on = the db... thus my assumption. Can you describe a scenario that would cause "deadlock"? =20 Here, now, practically, I am not actually facing any need or problem = with exclusivelock.. so maybe I better save everyone's time and only = post about this when I have real need.. but i just jumped in to see if I = could pre-iron out my understanding of exclusivelock. Thanks -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. [WebDNA] exclusivelock (Kenneth Grome 2011)
> [snip] >=20 >> rather than what you are saying which seems to be that the use of = [exclusivelock] [snip] > might *CAUSE* a deadlock in the case the OP was facing. >>=20 >> Or am I missing something in my understanding in what you, or Grant, = are saying? >=20 >=20 > Where did I say that using [exclusivelock] would cause a deadlock? :-/ >=20 Oh, sorry.. right; you did not say that.. but I just inferred it. Imagine the db was so busy that we could not get an exclusivelock (when = we tried)... then I *assumed* that would cause "deadlock". ..OR that = trying too vigorously (i.e. too often) to access a db currently under = exclusivelock could cause "deadlock".=20 No? =20 (Maybe I do not understand what deadlock even means?) =20 Grant was addressing the OP's deadlock issue.. suggesting it was caused = by antivirus software on Windows grabbing it's infamous exclusivelock on = the db... thus my assumption. Can you describe a scenario that would cause "deadlock"? =20 Here, now, practically, I am not actually facing any need or problem = with exclusivelock.. so maybe I better save everyone's time and only = post about this when I have real need.. but i just jumped in to see if I = could pre-iron out my understanding of exclusivelock. Thanks -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (2000) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) Resume Catalog ? (1997) mass mailing (1998) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) # fields limited? (1997) I'm having trouble using [url][interpret][math] together in lookup (1997) OT: Free Search Tools (2003) WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997) Case sensitivity and [showif] (1999) WebDNA and SQL (2003) Date Calulation (1997) Protect (1997) Questions To Answer (1997) problem with dates, NT version (1997) backup dbs (2005) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) blank page from template (1997) Date search bug (1998)