Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107602
interpreted = N
texte = > WebDNA has always been blowfish (at least it was when I last had a = hand in it). Plus salting and some other goodies, such as randomized = keys, to prevent brute-force reverse-engineering. You'll notice it = doesn't produce the same output twice if you encrypt the letter "a" = twice in a row. This is to help with dictionary attacks. Wow, that is a nice surprise! Cool Grant. You guys were ahead of the = crowd back then. That is a nice reason to feel secure now, for all of = us using [encrypt]. Can you say anything about the 'cost parameter'/'iteration count' used = by Webdna/blowfish? -G= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Grant Hulbert 2011)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories ("Brian B. Burton" 2011)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  13. [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
> WebDNA has always been blowfish (at least it was when I last had a = hand in it). Plus salting and some other goodies, such as randomized = keys, to prevent brute-force reverse-engineering. You'll notice it = doesn't produce the same output twice if you encrypt the letter "a" = twice in a row. This is to help with dictionary attacks. Wow, that is a nice surprise! Cool Grant. You guys were ahead of the = crowd back then. That is a nice reason to feel secure now, for all of = us using [encrypt]. Can you say anything about the 'cost parameter'/'iteration count' used = by Webdna/blowfish? -G= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

checking for [ and ] in form fields ... (1997) Upcoming 2.1 Release and PCS Committment (1997) Another question (1997) [Replace] really replaces? (2000) TCPConnect / Current Temperature (2004) Page Counters? (1997) Multiple fields on 1 input (1997) Explorer 3.0 (1997) WebCat2 - storing unformatted date data? (1997) WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997) add to cart within a page? (1997) Line Feed Character Appended (1998) Which beta for w* 4.1 and a problem w/b12 (1999) Attn: Bug in GeneralStore example b15 (1997) wrong authentication (1998) IE, Layers, and Select (2002) Seeking Better Display of results... (1997) [lookup] again... (2003) Emailer help....! (1997) Webdna 5.0 reference documentation (2003)