Re: [WebDNA] Re: table comma field delimiter bug?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108104
interpreted = N
texte = --Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I do not think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency. > In this case, should we ... If it were my software, and if this is not a bug, I would not change webdna's internal code at all. Instead I would simply re-write the docs: 1- Get rid of the instructions and example that tells us to populate a table by creating a two-dimensional array inside the table context. 2- Write some simple new instructions (with an example) that tells us to always use [append] to populate our tables. ----------- OR ----------- If you still want to change webdna's internal code so that we can continue to use the "populate via array" method, just get rid of comma delimiters inside the table context. Either way seems 100% correct to me. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome --Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I do not think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency.

> In this case, should we ...


If it were my software, and if this is not a bug, I would not change webdna's internal code at all. Instead I would simply re-write the docs:


1- Get rid of the instructions and example that tells us to populate a table by creating a two-dimensional array inside the table context.


2- Write some simple new instructions (with an example) that tells us to always use [append] to populate our tables.


----------- OR -----------


If you still want to change webdna's internal code so that we can continue to use the "populate via array" method, just get rid of comma delimiters inside the table context.


Either way seems 100% correct to me.


Sincerely,

Kenneth Grome



--Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  8. [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
--Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I do not think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency. > In this case, should we ... If it were my software, and if this is not a bug, I would not change webdna's internal code at all. Instead I would simply re-write the docs: 1- Get rid of the instructions and example that tells us to populate a table by creating a two-dimensional array inside the table context. 2- Write some simple new instructions (with an example) that tells us to always use [append] to populate our tables. ----------- OR ----------- If you still want to change webdna's internal code so that we can continue to use the "populate via array" method, just get rid of comma delimiters inside the table context. Either way seems 100% correct to me. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome --Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I do not think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency.

> In this case, should we ...


If it were my software, and if this is not a bug, I would not change webdna's internal code at all. Instead I would simply re-write the docs:


1- Get rid of the instructions and example that tells us to populate a table by creating a two-dimensional array inside the table context.


2- Write some simple new instructions (with an example) that tells us to always use [append] to populate our tables.


----------- OR -----------


If you still want to change webdna's internal code so that we can continue to use the "populate via array" method, just get rid of comma delimiters inside the table context.


Either way seems 100% correct to me.


Sincerely,

Kenneth Grome



--Boundary-01=_p1DEPXYgbqtgUnQ-- Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

FW: Shipping calculations (1997) how to get [protect] tag from webcat3b3 to 3.03 on IIS working (1998) Grep help (2004) CMSBuilder (2004) [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (2009) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Expiration of Carts (1997) Random search is not random (2002) I assume it is a safe bet this does not help (1998) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) select multiple (1997) BBEdit/HTMLcomments/WebCat/[/FONT] (1999) WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) Micro-managing External Links (2006) looping table rows (1999) WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997) expired beta (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) getchars broken? (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)