[WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108195
interpreted = N
texte = version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (William DeVaul 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  10. [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebMerchant problems (2000) WebDNA Solutions --> Date format suggestions (1998) ShowNext Command (1997) how to get [protect] tag from webcat3b3 to 3.03 on IIS working (1998) WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997) Shipping costs again (1998) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) WebCatalog for Mac 2.0.1 Released (1997) creator code (1997) The word TYPE in search contexts and fields (1998) E-Mailer (WebCatb15acgiMac) (1997) Summing fields (1997) What am I missing (1997) RAM variables (1997) AAAH: stupid sendmail (2001) Generating Report Totals (1997) SetHeader (1997) expired beta (1997) any WEBCAT gurus who are also PERL proficient? (1999) I need a Smart-quote workaround (1999)