[WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108195
interpreted = N
texte = version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (William DeVaul 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  10. [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebDav (2001) Image as submit button (2000) Welcome Back (was) Newbie Question (1999) Can't load tmpl files (1997) Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997) Date sorting (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) Handy Browser Counter Tip (1997) Repeating Fields (1997) Re:WebCat Emailer & Liststar (1997) Errata: WCS Newbie question (1997) RE: boldwords funky (1998) apostrophe in search item (1997) unusual search problem (1998) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) Two options to consider (2008) Which Pref is faster? (1998) Variable prices and Formulas.db (1997) japanese characters (1997) RE: WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAw (1998)