[WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108195
interpreted = N
texte = version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (William DeVaul 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  10. [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) [WebDNA] Off topic: ImageMagick (2008) RAM variables (1997) can you reassign loop index? (1998) cookies crumbling (1999) Extracting a Word (2000) Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) Writing custom WebCat searches?? (2000) Site Test Please [OT] (2005) off topic fetch vs PCS photomaster (1997) Caching [include] files ... (1997) Odd error in logs (1998) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) Carts & Refering URLs (1997) What am I missing (1997) Is the list server working? (1998) hidden databases (2000) Only charge card when product shipped ? (1997) Alternating colors (1997)