[WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108195
interpreted = N
texte = version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (William DeVaul 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  10. [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (Govinda 2012)
version=3D6.2 platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel In case anyone is inclined: please help me confirm: make a db with a field named [width]..plus other fields populate them all, several records...=20 search the db.. and display all records' field data to the web page. The only way I could get the value of the [width] field is with = [::width] (see manual on "scope"). But I don't understand why we should need to step up a level of scope to = get [width]. ?! At first I thought it was a collision with a [fileinfo] tag (somehow).. = but I am not using that here. and anyway that tag is named [imagewidth]. Is it way too late and I am being dumb (on top of blurry-eyed)? ... or = is it way too late, but this is still nevertheless a bug? -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Cookies not setting on IE (2002) Special characters in field names (1998) Price Not Appearing (2000) The word TYPE in search contexts and fields (1998) Protect Tag and Groups (1998) RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997) ShowNext & Showif together (1999) code below an [authenticate] gets evaluated? (2000) [CART] (1997) External Images (1998) [WebDNA] Moving to Sandbox broke price (2009) Making webcam movies (2003) [LOOKUP] (1997) format crash! (1997) WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997) macosx 1 process, linux N processes, macosx chokes under load (2001) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Trouble with Netscape (1998) [WebDNA] ImageMagick function library now available (2009) shownext problems (1998)