Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108198
interpreted = N
texte = > For me this just goes back to my college database theory class where I = learned that, no matter what, you should never ever use any reserved = word as a variable name. Even when, in this case, it seems completely = valid. >=20 > -Matt >=20 sure, I agree. but where in the manual is it shown that [width] is used = by any part of the webdna language? -G
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> For me this just goes back to my college database theory class where I = learned that, no matter what, you should never ever use any reserved = word as a variable name. Even when, in this case, it seems completely = valid. >=20 > -Matt >=20 sure, I agree. but where in the manual is it shown that [width] is used = by any part of the webdna language? -G
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997)
HTML Editors (1997)
Alternating colors (1997)
FIXED: Showing Results Alphabetically in Columns (top to (2002)
WC2f3 (1997)
Huge databases and RAM (1998)
Truncated Sendmail (1998)
List Var (2000)
Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997)
bye bye tax rate (1998)
Out of the woodwork (2007)
webcat nt (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
[WebDNA] mod_WebDNA_apache2.2.so: mach-0, but wrong architecture (2010)
Problems with shopping cart (1997)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
Duplicate emails with bcc (2000)
IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)