---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing listGovinda; sorry about the =mess in my latest mail - I got tired =yesterday.*** last =question from yesterday - clarified ***Do you know if <Automatically commit databases to disk =after modification> is the same as having a <commitdatabase =...> at the end of all/any [append] / [replace] within a =codebase.
Yes, AFAIK, this is correct =^^^.Meaning that they are equal but =absolute better than Flushdatabases.
But this ^^^ , =I do not understand what you are asking.*** = last question from yesterday - clarified =***The reason for my question =above was to figure out if my next move should be =enabling <Automatically commit databases to disk after =modification> or just taking on the task of doing a =<commitdatabase...> after (more or less) all of my [append] or =[replace] tags.If I was to gain speed / =performance by choosing one over the other then that is what I am =looking =for./PalleOn =01/02/2012, at 19.21, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote:Hi all,---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing listI =have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of =performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me =twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do =not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I =loose data - heavily.So what is the best =alternative to "Automatically commit =databases to disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT =loosing any data.Any good =suggestions?/Palle.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/l=ist/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/l=ist/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us
|
---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing listGovinda; sorry about the =mess in my latest mail - I got tired =yesterday.*** last =question from yesterday - clarified ***Do you know if <Automatically commit databases to disk =after modification> is the same as having a <commitdatabase =...> at the end of all/any [append] / [replace] within a =codebase.
Yes, AFAIK, this is correct =^^^.Meaning that they are equal but =absolute better than Flushdatabases.
But this ^^^ , =I do not understand what you are asking.*** = last question from yesterday - clarified =***The reason for my question =above was to figure out if my next move should be =enabling <Automatically commit databases to disk after =modification> or just taking on the task of doing a =<commitdatabase...> after (more or less) all of my [append] or =[replace] tags.If I was to gain speed / =performance by choosing one over the other then that is what I am =looking =for./PalleOn =01/02/2012, at 19.21, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote:Hi all,---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing listI =have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of =performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me =twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do =not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I =loose data - heavily.So what is the best =alternative to "Automatically commit =databases to disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT =loosing any data.Any good =suggestions?/Palle.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/l=ist/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/l=ist/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...