Hi all,
I = have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily.
So what is the best = alternative to "Automatically commit = databases to disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT = loosing any data.
Any good = suggestions?
= --Apple-Mail=_D50431A6-D8B0-4274-A568-17CBD3DAAE87--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail=_D50431A6-D8B0-4274-A568-17CBD3DAAE87 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Govinda; sorry about the mess in my latest mail - I got tired yesterday. *** last question from yesterday - clarified *** > Do you know if
is the same as having a at the end of = all/any [append] / [replace] within a codebase. Yes, AFAIK, this is correct ^^^. > Meaning that they are equal but absolute better than Flushdatabases. But this ^^^ , I do not understand what you are asking. *** last question from yesterday - clarified *** The reason for my question above was to figure out if my next move = should be enabling or just taking on the task of doing a = after (more or less) all of my [append] or [replace] tags. If I was to gain speed / performance by choosing one over the other then = that is what I am looking for. /Palle On 01/02/2012, at 19.21, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily. >=20 > So what is the best alternative to "Automatically commit databases to = disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT loosing any data. >=20 > Any good suggestions? >=20 > /Palle > --------------------------------------------------------- This message = is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To = unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_D50431A6-D8B0-4274-A568-17CBD3DAAE87 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Do you know if <Automatically commit databases to disk = after modification> is the same as having a <commitdatabase = ...> at the end of all/any [append] / [replace] within a = codebase.
Yes, AFAIK, this is correct = ^^^.
Meaning that they are equal but = absolute better than Flushdatabases.
But this ^^^ , = I do not understand what you are asking.If I was to gain speed / = performance by choosing one over the other then that is what I am = looking = for.