Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108920
interpreted = N
texte = Chris mentioned moving toward "consistency" and it would be consistent to allow all variables to have long names if it's not going to be too difficult. Then again, WSC has lots of other work to do, so I doubt that this is anywhere near the top of their list. I only mentioned it because I actually forgot about this limitation until I ran into it again. I guess my math variable names usually fall within the existing limits ... :) Sincerely, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com WebDNA Programming and Linux Server Administration > This has always been a limitation for math variables > (since before WebDNA even had text variables, of course > you were there, so you know this). This is one reason I > very rarely use math variables - I store my math values > in text variables: > > [text]ThisIsMyTextVariableWithALongName=[math][textvar1]+ > [textvar2][/math][/text] > > I can't speak to the difficult of changing WebDNA to > support longer math variable names, but agree that would > be nice and shouldn't break any existing sites. > > - Brian > > On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:10 AM, WebDNA Solutions wrote: > > Is there a reason why [math] variable names cannot be > > as long as text variable names? > > > > I just ran into a situation where I was creating > > dynamic math variable names, and one was a few > > characters longer than the others. So instead of > > calculating properly all I got was the raw tag. > > > > It seems rather bizarre that the NAME of the math > > variable is limited to such a small number of > > characters. Can this be changed easily? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > -- This message is sent to you because you are > > subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, > > E-mail to: archives: > > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug > > Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (WebDNA Solutions 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (Brian Fries 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (WebDNA Solutions 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (Govinda 2012)
  6. [WebDNA] Math variable name length limitations ... (WebDNA Solutions 2012)
Chris mentioned moving toward "consistency" and it would be consistent to allow all variables to have long names if it's not going to be too difficult. Then again, WSC has lots of other work to do, so I doubt that this is anywhere near the top of their list. I only mentioned it because I actually forgot about this limitation until I ran into it again. I guess my math variable names usually fall within the existing limits ... :) Sincerely, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.webdnasolutions.com WebDNA Programming and Linux Server Administration > This has always been a limitation for math variables > (since before WebDNA even had text variables, of course > you were there, so you know this). This is one reason I > very rarely use math variables - I store my math values > in text variables: > > [text]ThisIsMyTextVariableWithALongName=[math][textvar1]+ > [textvar2][/math][/text] > > I can't speak to the difficult of changing WebDNA to > support longer math variable names, but agree that would > be nice and shouldn't break any existing sites. > > - Brian > > On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:10 AM, WebDNA Solutions wrote: > > Is there a reason why [math] variable names cannot be > > as long as text variable names? > > > > I just ran into a situation where I was creating > > dynamic math variable names, and one was a few > > characters longer than the others. So instead of > > calculating properly all I got was the raw tag. > > > > It seems rather bizarre that the NAME of the math > > variable is limited to such a small number of > > characters. Can this be changed easily? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > -- This message is sent to you because you are > > subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, > > E-mail to: archives: > > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug > > Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us WebDNA Solutions

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997) return two fields w/ [lookup] (1998) Limits (2000) [group] ? (1997) encrypted query string trouble on OSX (2001) IE problems persist (2004) Search (1997) 2.1 Stuff (1998) Where is f2? (1997) Not really WebCat- (1997) [WebDNA] sort parameters in search (2015) Webcat/Webmerchant part II (1998) Summing fields (1997) Beta 18 (1997) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) This is an odd error (2001) search form problem.. (1997) Date search - yes or no (1997) OT: advice on Wintel server options (1998)