[BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Suggested Platform

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 110166
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multi-part message in MIME format.----=_Part_04CA0F71223844049A97B41EE661B7C7Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableI will be hosting multiple domains, however they will be all under my contr=ol. When you say 7.x does not support WebDNA commands I am not following=. Is there a completely new library of commands for 7.x=3F I would not h=ave an issue translating the sites if there is a real benefit. Are the o=lder 6.x command's being phased out=3F The no SQL support is not a real =issue but might be in the future. Will there be, in future releases supp=ort for SQL=3F

Where can I find information on 7.x from what I s=ee there is only 6.x info up on the website...

Also from what I =gather, all of you have committed to Linux=3F So Windows should be elimi=nated as an option for me.

Vincent

----- Original M=essage -----
From: Kenneth Grome [mailto:ken@webdnasolutions.com]
To: talk@webdna.us
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:12:46 -0600
Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Suggested Platform

Debian 6 is m=y favorite server OS. I must have setup a
dozen Debian servers= the past couple of years, mostly with
v7.x and Lighttpd. I ac=tually have one VPS running this
system in only 128MB RAM for a tota=l hosting cost of $10 per
year!

:)

v7.0 provides SQL s=upport whereas v7.1 does not. They are
both FastCGI so they wo=rk well with Lighttpd web server, but
neither of thee FastCGI versio=ns support WebDNA commands.

v6.2 provides SQL support and also in=terprets WebDNA
commands. What's more, it is multi-domain capa=ble, although
bad WebDNA code in one domain can bring down the entir=e
server, so multi-domain support in this manner may not be
the =best option in terms of domain isolation and security.

Lost of o=ptions to consider here.

What's the point of your server=3F = To serve one domain of
your own=3F To serve multiple domains =for hosting customers=3F
Do you need WebDNA code / domain isol=ation=3F Does your code
contain WebDNA commands=3F If so=, are you willing to replace
them with contexts or do you intend to =use your existing
code as-is=3F Do you require Apache for its =comprehensive and
well-documented feature set, or do you prefer Ligh=ttpd for
its minimal resource requirements and speed=3F
---------=------------------------------------------------
This message is sent= to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To unsubscribe, E-m=ail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>=;
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Rep=orting: support@webdna.us
----=_Part_04CA0F71223844049A97B41EE661B7C7-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.----=_Part_04CA0F71223844049A97B41EE661B7C7Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableI will be hosting multiple domains, however they will be all under my contr=ol. When you say 7.x does not support WebDNA commands I am not following=. Is there a completely new library of commands for 7.x=3F I would not h=ave an issue translating the sites if there is a real benefit. Are the o=lder 6.x command's being phased out=3F The no SQL support is not a real =issue but might be in the future. Will there be, in future releases supp=ort for SQL=3F

Where can I find information on 7.x from what I s=ee there is only 6.x info up on the website...

Also from what I =gather, all of you have committed to Linux=3F So Windows should be elimi=nated as an option for me.

Vincent

----- Original M=essage -----
From: Kenneth Grome [mailto:ken@webdnasolutions.com]
To: talk@webdna.us
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:12:46 -0600
Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Suggested Platform

Debian 6 is m=y favorite server OS. I must have setup a
dozen Debian servers= the past couple of years, mostly with
v7.x and Lighttpd. I ac=tually have one VPS running this
system in only 128MB RAM for a tota=l hosting cost of $10 per
year!

:)

v7.0 provides SQL s=upport whereas v7.1 does not. They are
both FastCGI so they wo=rk well with Lighttpd web server, but
neither of thee FastCGI versio=ns support WebDNA commands.

v6.2 provides SQL support and also in=terprets WebDNA
commands. What's more, it is multi-domain capa=ble, although
bad WebDNA code in one domain can bring down the entir=e
server, so multi-domain support in this manner may not be
the =best option in terms of domain isolation and security.

Lost of o=ptions to consider here.

What's the point of your server=3F = To serve one domain of
your own=3F To serve multiple domains =for hosting customers=3F
Do you need WebDNA code / domain isol=ation=3F Does your code
contain WebDNA commands=3F If so=, are you willing to replace
them with contexts or do you intend to =use your existing
code as-is=3F Do you require Apache for its =comprehensive and
well-documented feature set, or do you prefer Ligh=ttpd for
its minimal resource requirements and speed=3F
---------=------------------------------------------------
This message is sent= to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To unsubscribe, E-m=ail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>=;
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Rep=orting: support@webdna.us
----=_Part_04CA0F71223844049A97B41EE661B7C7--

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

[BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Suggested Platform

2013

Top Articles:

Related Readings: