Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111835
interpreted = N
texte = I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei= ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote= : >=20 > Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's > [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses? >=20 > [getchars start=3D2][!] > [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!] > [/!].[math][word][/math][!] > [/!][/listwords][!] > [/getchars][/!] >=20 >=20 > REQUEST TO WSC: >=20 > Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip > addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the > world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT > having to unmangle the resulting values first? >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Terry Wilson 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Dan Strong 2015)
  3. [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Kenneth Grome 2015)
I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei= ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote= : >=20 > Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's > [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses? >=20 > [getchars start=3D2][!] > [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!] > [/!].[math][word][/math][!] > [/!][/listwords][!] > [/getchars][/!] >=20 >=20 > REQUEST TO WSC: >=20 > Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip > addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the > world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT > having to unmangle the resulting values first? >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Terry Wilson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997) Sku numbers (1997) How To question on setting up downloads (1997) Sorting by date (1997) I'm tired of all this! (2000) Math with Time (1997) WebDNA 5.0 Questions (2003) Multiple prices (1997) Date Search (2004) So when do we get something similar? (1998) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) passing cart value (2003) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) WebCat2b12plugin - [search] is broken ... not! (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) [WebDNA] [lookup] fails when using [url] to wrap a value for potential "&" char? (2009) Merging databases (1997) Part Html part WebDNA (1997) Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) Multiple Items (1998)