Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112183
interpreted = N
texte = That=92s a very very compelling point. I=92m going to rename my function = IsSet for better readability and to be more consistent with other = languages.=20 Thank you! Brian B. > On Mar 14, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >=20 > Yeah, I think either works well.. > The only thing I=92ll say is =91?=92 in most languages is a ternary = operator=85 which makes it a logical choice for this kind of comparison, = but maybe lessens the =93usual scope=94 of a standardized ternary = operator, when using only for checking if a variable is set or not. >=20 > I suppose there is a way to widen the scope of your [?] function=85 = but not really needed.. just a thought. :-) >=20 > Donovan >=20 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Brian Burton 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Brian Burton 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Dan Strong 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Terry Wilson 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Steve Braun 2015)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Steve Braun 2015)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Brian Burton 2015)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Terry Wilson 2015)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Dan Strong 2015)
  15. [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (Steve Braun 2015)
That=92s a very very compelling point. I=92m going to rename my function = IsSet for better readability and to be more consistent with other = languages.=20 Thank you! Brian B. > On Mar 14, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >=20 > Yeah, I think either works well.. > The only thing I=92ll say is =91?=92 in most languages is a ternary = operator=85 which makes it a logical choice for this kind of comparison, = but maybe lessens the =93usual scope=94 of a standardized ternary = operator, when using only for checking if a variable is set or not. >=20 > I suppose there is a way to widen the scope of your [?] function=85 = but not really needed.. just a thought. :-) >=20 > Donovan >=20 Brian Burton

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:Merging databases (1997) WebCat & Liststar ... & Rumpus, too! (1997) [OT] Indexing of dynamic web sites (2003) Summ=T Problem (1997) OT: Poll Please (2002) WebDNA on Fedora 5 -Apache won't start (2006) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) New WebCatalog Version !!! (1997) using showpage and showcart commands (1996) Setting Cart value (2000) creating a ShipCosts database (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) Summing fields (1997) Performance Issue (2000) emailer (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) WC2f3 (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) PCS Frames (1997) docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)