Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 112187
interpreted = N
texte = BrianIf the .frag file is only ever to be included and displayed in an HTML =file why don=E2=80=99t you use a SHOWIF.At the top of the HTML a TEXT var i.e. [TEXT]SHOWFRAG=3DT[/TEXT], then =wrap the contents of the .frag=20[SHOWIF [SHOWFRAG]=3DT]FRAG CONTENTS[/SHOWIF]Then if the .frag file is ever served the content will be nothing.Kind regardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au> On 17 Mar 2015, at 09:37, Brian Burton wrote:>=20> Ken,>=20> I=E2=80=99m doing Ok on writing out the fragments, and using them as =[include]=E2=80=99d content as needed. I do not write out a whole page =of html because I have personalized dynamic content on other parts of =the page.=20>=20> The concern is have is, and why i don=E2=80=99t want this mapped as a =template is that the webserver will serve up template files when =requested. i.e. if you have storefunctions.inc as a file, and someone is =savvy enough to request it, either it isn=E2=80=99t mapped to webdna, =and Apache happily serves up your raw webdna as text to who ever ask for =it (bad) or if it is mapped, then webdna will try to run any embedded =code and then return it to Apache to show to your malicious visitor. =What I want/need is an extension that webdna can cache, and yet that =Apache ignores, or refuses to acknowledge exists.=20>=20> I feel like I=E2=80=99m overlooking something, but I haven=E2=80=99t =had enough time to dig in and find a good solution. Has anyone solved =this already?>=20>=20> -Brian B.=20>=20>=20>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Kenneth Grome =wrote:>>=20>> I would write a WebDNA script that runs automatically once a day>> (via cron, trigger, etc.) and writes complete .html files, one for>> every author, overwriting whatever matching files were already>> there. Then you know for a fact that all these pages are>> up-to-date as of today, and WebDNA never has to do any of the hard>> work at the time the visitor actually requests one of these pages.>>=20>> If you don't like this idea and instead you actually want WebDNA>> to cache your .inc and .frag files you can change their suffixes>> to one that WebDNA is already processing, or add .inc and .frag to>> your WebCatalog "ValidTemplateExtensions" preference and to the>> "AddHandler webcatalog2-handler" directive in Apache's webdna.conf>> file.>>=20>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>>=20>>=20>> On 03/16/2015 02:04 PM, Brian Burton wrote:>>> Greetings!>>>=20>>> What is the WebDNA community doing for cacheing page fragment>>> files? On my website I have some pages that require significant>>> processing to generate the visible content. To save time, I>>> only render it out the processing intense parts once an hour or>>> day or whatever (as required). I save this out as a fragment of>>> HTML in a file (with an .inc or .frag extension)>>>=20>>> An example of this might be a database of books, and I need to>>> create a page that has as html links, a list of unique authors>>> and a count of books attributed to that author. Rather then do>>> this every time the page is requested, i first check to see if>>> the fragment exists, then check to see if it=E2=80=99s current, and>>> then if both of those are false I render out the html, save it>>> in a new fragment file, and display it to the user.>>>=20>>> SO.. here=E2=80=99s my question: the fragments are saved as .inc or>>> .frag. WebDNA does not cache these as they are neither>>> templates nor databases. This causes a lot of disk activity as>>> I use fragments extensively to speed up the the quasi-static>>> parts of the website. How can I get webdna to cache these? I am>>> hesitant to add the extensions to the template field in the>>> settings. I do not want the fragment under any circumstance to>>> be able to be directly accessed by a web visitor. Should I>>> block the extension from being served by Apache? Would it be>>> possible to get a third cache field type in the webdna>>> settings? Thoughts? Suggestions?>>>=20>>> Thanks! Brian B.=20>>> --------------------------------------------------------- This>>> message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the>>> mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives:>>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:>>> support@webdna.us>>>=20>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us>>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Donovan Brooke 2015)
Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Stuart Tremain 2015)
Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Brian Burton 2015)
Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Kenneth Grome 2015)
[WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Brian Burton 2015)

BrianIf the .frag file is only ever to be included and displayed in an HTML =file why don=E2=80=99t you use a SHOWIF.At the top of the HTML a TEXT var i.e. [text]SHOWFRAG=3DT[/TEXT], then =wrap the contents of the .frag=20[SHOWIF [SHOWFRAG]=3DT]FRAG CONTENTS[/SHOWIF]Then if the .frag file is ever served the content will be nothing.Kind regardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au> On 17 Mar 2015, at 09:37, Brian Burton wrote:>=20> Ken,>=20> I=E2=80=99m doing Ok on writing out the fragments, and using them as =[include]=E2=80=99d content as needed. I do not write out a whole page =of html because I have personalized dynamic content on other parts of =the page.=20>=20> The concern is have is, and why i don=E2=80=99t want this mapped as a =template is that the webserver will serve up template files when =requested. i.e. if you have storefunctions.inc as a file, and someone is =savvy enough to request it, either it isn=E2=80=99t mapped to webdna, =and Apache happily serves up your raw webdna as text to who ever ask for =it (bad) or if it is mapped, then webdna will try to run any embedded =code and then return it to Apache to show to your malicious visitor. =What I want/need is an extension that webdna can cache, and yet that =Apache ignores, or refuses to acknowledge exists.=20>=20> I feel like I=E2=80=99m overlooking something, but I haven=E2=80=99t =had enough time to dig in and find a good solution. Has anyone solved =this already?>=20>=20> -Brian B.=20>=20>=20>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Kenneth Grome =wrote:>>=20>> I would write a WebDNA script that runs automatically once a day>> (via cron, trigger, etc.) and writes complete .html files, one for>> every author, overwriting whatever matching files were already>> there. Then you know for a fact that all these pages are>> up-to-date as of today, and WebDNA never has to do any of the hard>> work at the time the visitor actually requests one of these pages.>>=20>> If you don't like this idea and instead you actually want WebDNA>> to cache your .inc and .frag files you can change their suffixes>> to one that WebDNA is already processing, or add .inc and .frag to>> your WebCatalog "ValidTemplateExtensions" preference and to the>> "AddHandler webcatalog2-handler" directive in Apache's webdna.conf>> file.>>=20>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>>=20>>=20>> On 03/16/2015 02:04 PM, Brian Burton wrote:>>> Greetings!>>>=20>>> What is the WebDNA community doing for cacheing page fragment>>> files? On my website I have some pages that require significant>>> processing to generate the visible content. To save time, I>>> only render it out the processing intense parts once an hour or>>> day or whatever (as required). I save this out as a fragment of>>> HTML in a file (with an .inc or .frag extension)>>>=20>>> An example of this might be a database of books, and I need to>>> create a page that has as html links, a list of unique authors>>> and a count of books attributed to that author. Rather then do>>> this every time the page is requested, i first check to see if>>> the fragment exists, then check to see if it=E2=80=99s current, and>>> then if both of those are false I render out the html, save it>>> in a new fragment file, and display it to the user.>>>=20>>> SO.. here=E2=80=99s my question: the fragments are saved as .inc or>>> .frag. WebDNA does not cache these as they are neither>>> templates nor databases. This causes a lot of disk activity as>>> I use fragments extensively to speed up the the quasi-static>>> parts of the website. How can I get webdna to cache these? I am>>> hesitant to add the extensions to the template field in the>>> settings. I do not want the fragment under any circumstance to>>> be able to be directly accessed by a web visitor. Should I>>> block the extension from being served by Apache? Would it be>>> possible to get a third cache field type in the webdna>>> settings? Thoughts? Suggestions?>>>=20>>> Thanks! Brian B.=20>>> --------------------------------------------------------- This>>> message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the>>> mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives:>>> http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:>>> support@webdna.us>>>=20>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us>>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files

2015

Top Articles:

Related Readings: