Re: [WebDNA] 30 Minute Cookies
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2016
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112666
interpreted = N
texte = 249 On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:10 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > What we do offer to WebDNA customers are new tools. You cannot use = [session] as you would use a [cookie]: it gives you a way to decide if = an IP change will or will not be a trigger for closing a session, it = will NOT allow a user to access his own session and represents a huge = step forward for security , it gives you the possibility to assign = sessions to robots... Your imagination and creativity is your best = friend here. >=20 > About [biotype], know that several banks are showing great interest = into WebDNA based solutions and that this "small addition" might = revolutionize WebDNA future. >=20 > Again, what we do here is not trying to keep an old product under = medical assistance but to create, improve and make it great again. >=20 > - chris=20 >=20 Hi Chris, I am happy that WSC is putting resources into WebDNA improvements, and I = agree that your logic behind session could be useful. However, I agree = with Ken ( It must be a blue moon out tonight ;-) ) that it can=92t be = used in the way you intend. I can already hear my customers being angry with = me. ;-) If I were you, I would change the name to something like [identify] (or = something more fitting). I can see a HASH like this used to make = decisions on lesser security issues, such as whether or not to ban = someone from a forum. In fact, I=92d be happy to implement that kind of = thing into my forum=85 the point is, this kind of thing needs some human = interaction associated with it=92s use. =20 Regarding session=85 we already have a good one.. and yes, it does have = the option of using cookies built right in it already. I know you don=92t = like it, but it=92s a fact that it=92s one of the best features of = WebDNA which just needs a little innovation. I haven=92t read about bioType yet, but my only comment is that if it is = based off similar non-standard logic.. and if banks are indeed looking = into it, you better make sure it works. ;-) Law suites are not fun.=20 New features are great, but I would lean towards creative features based = on standards. If you are to keep these tools that you created in-house, = to get us to use them, I would say that you should spell out exactly = what is going on behind the scenes.. what =93questions=94 are being = asked by the logic, etc. Just my .02=A2 Sincerely, Donovan --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
249 On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:10 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > What we do offer to WebDNA customers are new tools. You cannot use = [session] as you would use a [cookie]: it gives you a way to decide if = an IP change will or will not be a trigger for closing a session, it = will NOT allow a user to access his own session and represents a huge = step forward for security , it gives you the possibility to assign = sessions to robots... Your imagination and creativity is your best = friend here. >=20 > About [biotype], know that several banks are showing great interest = into WebDNA based solutions and that this "small addition" might = revolutionize WebDNA future. >=20 > Again, what we do here is not trying to keep an old product under = medical assistance but to create, improve and make it great again. >=20 > - chris=20 >=20 Hi Chris, I am happy that WSC is putting resources into WebDNA improvements, and I = agree that your logic behind session could be useful. However, I agree = with Ken ( It must be a blue moon out tonight ;-) ) that it can=92t be = used in the way you intend. I can already hear my customers being angry with = me. ;-) If I were you, I would change the name to something like [identify] (or = something more fitting). I can see a HASH like this used to make = decisions on lesser security issues, such as whether or not to ban = someone from a forum. In fact, I=92d be happy to implement that kind of = thing into my forum=85 the point is, this kind of thing needs some human = interaction associated with it=92s use. =20 Regarding session=85 we already have a good one.. and yes, it does have = the option of using cookies built right in it already. I know you don=92t = like it, but it=92s a fact that it=92s one of the best features of = WebDNA which just needs a little innovation. I haven=92t read about bioType yet, but my only comment is that if it is = based off similar non-standard logic.. and if banks are indeed looking = into it, you better make sure it works. ;-) Law suites are not fun.=20 New features are great, but I would lean towards creative features based = on standards. If you are to keep these tools that you created in-house, = to get us to use them, I would say that you should spell out exactly = what is going on behind the scenes.. what =93questions=94 are being = asked by the logic, etc. Just my .02=A2 Sincerely, Donovan --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Who is doing sign-ups-got it (1998)
OT: 800x600 (2003)
Replace command help (1998)
SMSI FTP - calander system (2002)
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
More than one db with the same namn (was: WC2f3) (1997)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
New public beta available (1997)
Search-context (1999)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
Sorting like UBB (2003)
Multiple fields on 1 input (1997)
Date Range works (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
[lookup] speed sales pitch (2003)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Email within tmpl ? (1997)
Image maps/Webcat (1997)
Where's 3.0 Online Docs? (1999)
Best way to handle 404 errors with WebDNA and Web* V (2003)