Can he do that?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19697
interpreted = N
texte = I wanna use a grouping in a contextual search, in english:Search the database, the using 1 input field to search the 'name' and the 'email' field. Using another input field the users password is input. if we have a match between the email or the name and the password checks out then return the record.in dna terms this would be sumpin like this:[search db=giveaway.db&group1field=name+email&eqgroup1datarq=[from.name]&eqpassdata rq=[form.pass]&max=1]only it would work.Can I use a hidden field on the form to group name & email? mmm no that don't make sense.The tough part is making the logic in one search context. I want to force there to be a match between the password and either the name or email. If there is no match name or email then I don't want to return something based on the password. Can I do it in one search or do I haves to use 2.Robert Minor _________________________________________________________________________ Cybermill Communications webmaster@cybermill.com 8616 Joseph Ave. http://www.cybermill.com St. Louis, MO 63144 (314) 962-4024 _________________________________________________________________________ Purveyors of fine websites and high bandwith. Colocation and domain hosting available. Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Can he do that? (bob 1998)
  2. Re: Can he do that? (John Hill 1998)
  3. Can he do that? (bob 1998)
I wanna use a grouping in a contextual search, in english:Search the database, the using 1 input field to search the 'name' and the 'email' field. Using another input field the users password is input. if we have a match between the email or the name and the password checks out then return the record.in dna terms this would be sumpin like this:[search db=giveaway.db&group1field=name+email&eqgroup1datarq=[from.name]&eqpassdata rq=[form.pass]&max=1]only it would work.Can I use a hidden field on the form to group name & email? mmm no that don't make sense.The tough part is making the logic in one search context. I want to force there to be a match between the password and either the name or email. If there is no match name or email then I don't want to return something based on the password. Can I do it in one search or do I haves to use 2.Robert Minor _________________________________________________________________________ Cybermill Communications webmaster@cybermill.com 8616 Joseph Ave. http://www.cybermill.com St. Louis, MO 63144 (314) 962-4024 _________________________________________________________________________ Purveyors of fine websites and high bandwith. Colocation and domain hosting available. bob

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

2 problems with WebCatalog on Solaris (2001) table import function crashes server (2008) deadlock (2000) database visibility (2000) WebCatalog/WebMerchant 2.1 (1998) NT beta ReadMe missing (b12-b15) (1997) redirect from the errorsMessages.db entry (1997) [subtotal] and others (1997) Cookies and WebCat?? (1999) [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (2000) [WC 2.1.30] Stack overflow. (2000) Separate SSL Server (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) Logical and or in [hideif] (1997) Help name our technology! (1997) If Empty ? (1997) WebDNA Codes in Secure Mode (1997) Conditional searching & displaying (1997) [WebDNA] Safari making duplicate records (2009) WebCat/PDF Integration Time Est (2000)