[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax??

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 36398
interpreted = N
texte = Rob, (or anyone who knows the answer)I haven't tried your below code from a couple weeks ago... but assuming it does (it seems simple enough)WHY does it work?Your [math] syntax is not something I have seen documented or elsewhere.Could you elaborate? Does the technique rely on an artifact we may see dissolve in a future version of webcat (as if you knew that ;-)???-JohnIf you absolutely, positively *have* to have a non-null boolean value for a checkbox (which you don't, really : ) it's simpler to implement in WC4.-- file: checkboxesAdNauseum.html ----------
check 1
check 2
check 3
[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck2=[check2]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck3=[check3]=1[/math]check 1 = [nuCheck1]
check 2 = [nuCheck2]
check 3 = [nuCheck3]
----------------------------------The nuCheckx variables will *always* exist, and be 1 for checked, 0 if not.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (John Butler 2000)
  2. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  3. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  4. [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (John Butler 2000)
Rob, (or anyone who knows the answer)I haven't tried your below code from a couple weeks ago... but assuming it does (it seems simple enough)WHY does it work?Your [math] syntax is not something I have seen documented or elsewhere.Could you elaborate? Does the technique rely on an artifact we may see dissolve in a future version of webcat (as if you knew that ;-)???-JohnIf you absolutely, positively *have* to have a non-null boolean value for a checkbox (which you don't, really : ) it's simpler to implement in WC4.-- file: checkboxesAdNauseum.html ----------
check 1
check 2
check 3
[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck2=[check2]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck3=[check3]=1[/math]check 1 = [nuCheck1]
check 2 = [nuCheck2]
check 3 = [nuCheck3]
----------------------------------The nuCheckx variables will *always* exist, and be 1 for checked, 0 if not.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) japanese characters (1997) Setting up the server (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) Tracking System? (1997) Server crash (1997) Projects & Contractors (1997) WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 New Features (1997) Writefile doesn't work, which permissions to use? (2005) weird convertchars behavior (2000) Calendar (1997) Grep Ampersands (2008) plugin-acgi, different results (1997) Spawn doesn't work as advertised ... (2000) Triggers (1999) Sorry if this is really stupid but.. (2000) format_to_days on NT (1997)