Re: Grouping fields problem
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20699
interpreted = N
texte = are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting the the acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past. >I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a >search using these parameters: > >group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE > >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently >ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :( > >Does this indicate a bug? >Or is my technique wrong? > >By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the >search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result >... :( > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.netBritt T. -------------------------------------------------------- || Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com || -------------------------------------------------------- || World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 || || Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 || || Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 || || Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 || --------------------------------------------------------
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
are you using the acgi or the plugin? I had a lot of problems getting the the acgi to work correctly with required fields in the past. >I think there's a bug when using the groupXfield technique. I tried a >search using these parameters: > >group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE > >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently >ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :( > >Does this indicate a bug? >Or is my technique wrong? > >By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the >search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result >... :( > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.netBritt T. -------------------------------------------------------- || Britt@fishingworld.com || Britt@easttexas.com || -------------------------------------------------------- || World Masters - || P.O. Box 1989 || || Graphic Designs, || Lindale, TX 75771 || || Web Site Development, || Phone: (903) 882-8877 || || Web Site Hosting. || Fax: (903) 882-3110 || --------------------------------------------------------
Britt T.
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
How do I find where my IP address is located (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Searching,Brain Dead! (1999)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
For you expert WebDNA coders (was Interesting speed (2003)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
Include a big block of text (1997)
[WebDNA] Email Problem (2009)
OT: Photo Resources (2002)
OK, here goes... (1997)
Math Problem - Format? (1997)
[search] in formulas.db (1997)
multi-paragraph fields (1997)
Group search doesn't work. (1997)
Shell Script needed (2003)
Sorting Numbers (1997)
Modifying order output (1997)
Forcing a NEWCART (1997)
[WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (2013)
convert characters (2003)