Re: Grouping fields problem

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20714
interpreted = N
texte = >group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE> >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :(By default, the word match is sub-string, so taking out the groupxword parameters won't make any difference on the search. the text you have U.S.%WEST is probably not in the database (with the percent sign) so perhaps that's causing the confusion.>By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result ... :(Considering it was search for all records that had a U or S in them, returning all the records seems possible.JOhn. John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast Software eCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Grouping fields problem (John Hill 1998)
  2. Re: Grouping fields problem (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  3. Re: Grouping fields problem (Britt T. 1998)
  4. Re: Grouping fields problem (Britt T. 1998)
  5. Grouping fields problem (Kenneth Grome 1998)
>group1field=company >wogroup1datarq=GTE >group1word=ss >group2field=company >wogroup2datarq=U.S.%WEST >group2word=ss > >... and my results were exactly the same as when I used only this parameter: > >wocompanydatarq=GTE> >Therefore, this means that all the group2field stuff above was apparently ignored (for some unknown reason) ... :(By default, the word match is sub-string, so taking out the groupxword parameters won't make any difference on the search. the text you have U.S.%WEST is probably not in the database (with the percent sign) so perhaps that's causing the confusion.>By the way, when I removed the rq's from both search parameters above, the search retrieved all the records in the database, another incorrect result ... :(Considering it was search for all records that had a U or S in them, returning all the records seems possible.JOhn. John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast Software eCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com John Hill

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WCf2 and nested tags (1997) Cyberstudio and WebDNA (1997) NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997) DB Size - MAX (2004) WebSTAR 2.1 freezes my Mac (1997) test (2003) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997) WebDNA Writer Needed (1997) [WebDNA] anyone know how to enable URLs in plain text to links? (2009) Date Time Oddness (1999) Catalogs and W* (1996) Summing fields (1997) &FieldNametype=time unnecessary? (2000) ShowNext (1997) F3 crashing server (1997) Problems with [Applescript] (1997) Multiple Ad databases? (1997) Hard Questions ? (1997) [append] (1997) Associative lookup style? (1997)