Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25343
interpreted = N
texte = >I think that it would be appropriate for PCS to always >URL'ize ShowIf and HideIf comparisons. I cannot think of a single instance >where it would not be correct. The only enhancement I can think of is some way >to force a numeric comparison (stripping any non-numeric characters before >testing).I hope your suggestion to force numeric comparisons is not followed, unless it is a configurable option. Otherwise how would we be able to compare non-numeric characters?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  2. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  3. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  4. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  5. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  6. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  7. when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  8. when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
>I think that it would be appropriate for PCS to always >URL'ize ShowIf and HideIf comparisons. I cannot think of a single instance >where it would not be correct. The only enhancement I can think of is some way >to force a numeric comparison (stripping any non-numeric characters before >testing).I hope your suggestion to force numeric comparisons is not followed, unless it is a configurable option. Otherwise how would we be able to compare non-numeric characters?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Exclude by date - multiple (1997) Mult-File Upload w/ Web Star (2000) Enhanced Master Counter? (1997) [WebDNA] SHA-256 (2015) [SearchString] usage (1997) [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (2009) ErrorMessages.db suggestion (1997) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) Sku numbers (1997) Secure server question (1997) Using EIMS instead of Emailer (1998) carriage returns in data (1997) upgrade? (1997) Sending an email to all )or some) email addresses int he database (1999) Setting up shop (1997) Beta List (1998) Need correct syntax for writing to header2 (1999) passing info to thankyou.tpl (1998) Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997) [append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997)