Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25343
interpreted = N
texte = >I think that it would be appropriate for PCS to always >URL'ize ShowIf and HideIf comparisons. I cannot think of a single instance >where it would not be correct. The only enhancement I can think of is some way >to force a numeric comparison (stripping any non-numeric characters before >testing).I hope your suggestion to force numeric comparisons is not followed, unless it is a configurable option. Otherwise how would we be able to compare non-numeric characters?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  2. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  3. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  4. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  5. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  6. Re: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  7. when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
  8. when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison risky? (John Butler 1999)
>I think that it would be appropriate for PCS to always >URL'ize ShowIf and HideIf comparisons. I cannot think of a single instance >where it would not be correct. The only enhancement I can think of is some way >to force a numeric comparison (stripping any non-numeric characters before >testing).I hope your suggestion to force numeric comparisons is not followed, unless it is a configurable option. Otherwise how would we be able to compare non-numeric characters?================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Problems deleting when a search field is blank... (1998) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Ampersand Character (&) (1997) Dumb Question about Docs (1997) Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) Initiating NewCart (1997) Cart questions (1997) WC 2.0 frames feature (1997) Bad Cookie / Internet Option / Internet Explorer (2004) Items XX to XX shown (1997) Order not created error (never mind) (1997) Closing db's & caching templates (was: Shippingcalculations) (1997) ShowNext (was New WebCatalog Site) (1997) [cart] Taxrate - seriously .. (2002) Clear command and ShoppingCart.tmpl (1997) Running WebCat from a CD-ROM (1997) Error messages (2004) New Install (2003) # fields limited? (1997) [DOS]/DOS query perhaps OT (2003)