Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25593
interpreted = N
texte = Okay, I don't want to split hairs about Sherlock. I meant the end result of using Sherlock is that is DOES actually index all the words inside of documents. Am I right?The more important issue about my questions was really abou Resource Forks and IPTC data on Photoshop images.Thanks for the input. -- Sincerely,Patrick O'Brien Systems Adminstrator Sandusky Register http://www.sanduskyregister.com Top Interactive http://www.topinteractive.com 419-625-5500 ext. 333On Friday, December 17, 1999, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >> Can somebody tell me if it is possible to have WebCat index text like Sherlock >> can? > >The question makes sense and does not. > >Sherlock does not index anything: it is only a search interface that uses >the index engine of MacOs. > >For PC people, that does not really mean anything, only that a search for a >file or a folder is 100 times faster on a Mac than on Windows. > >WebCat does not index anything either: it is just what it is and does its >own job by doing its own indexing. > >Do you wish to make your site searchable? With WebCat you can do that easily >if most of your text is stocked in one or many databases, so that it >generates your pages dynamically, then you can build a search engine to >retrieve the information from these databases. > >We use IIS4 as a web server (for commodity reasons) and the index engine in >IIS4 would not index the resulting pages as it should do, but index the >pages as they are on the hard drives, and really, [include file=header.inc] >does not help it. > >We are happy with the search engine as it was built, using the database >solution. > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. >To end your Mail problems go to >. > >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > >------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing (Patrick O'Brien 1999)
  2. Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing (Rob Marquardt 1999)
  3. Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing (Patrick O'Brien 1999)
  4. Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing (Nicolas Verhaeghe 1999)
  5. Re: WebCat (or other) Indexing (Bob Minor 1999)
  6. WebCat (or other) Indexing (The Celt 1999)
Okay, I don't want to split hairs about Sherlock. I meant the end result of using Sherlock is that is DOES actually index all the words inside of documents. Am I right?The more important issue about my questions was really abou Resource Forks and IPTC data on Photoshop images.Thanks for the input. -- Sincerely,Patrick O'Brien Systems Adminstrator Sandusky Register http://www.sanduskyregister.com Top Interactive http://www.topinteractive.com 419-625-5500 ext. 333On Friday, December 17, 1999, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >> Can somebody tell me if it is possible to have WebCat index text like Sherlock >> can? > >The question makes sense and does not. > >Sherlock does not index anything: it is only a search interface that uses >the index engine of MacOs. > >For PC people, that does not really mean anything, only that a search for a >file or a folder is 100 times faster on a Mac than on Windows. > >WebCat does not index anything either: it is just what it is and does its >own job by doing its own indexing. > >Do you wish to make your site searchable? With WebCat you can do that easily >if most of your text is stocked in one or many databases, so that it >generates your pages dynamically, then you can build a search engine to >retrieve the information from these databases. > >We use IIS4 as a web server (for commodity reasons) and the index engine in >IIS4 would not index the resulting pages as it should do, but index the >pages as they are on the hard drives, and really, [include file=header.inc] >does not help it. > >We are happy with the search engine as it was built, using the database >solution. > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. >To end your Mail problems go to >. > >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > >------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Patrick O'Brien

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Hiding usernames and passwords in URL (1998) All questions are welcome on this list (1997) [SQL] on MacOs to SQL Server ... HOW TO? (2000) brain teaser with an advanced search (2001) WCS Newbie question (1997) Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) text conversions (1999) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) WebTen and WebCat (1997) Multi-processor Mac info ... (1997) [/application] error? (1997) Trigger Problem ---- SOLVED (2003) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997) $Replace with [founditems] (1997) refreshing IE with posted .tmpl (1997) NT vs Mac (1997) WebDNA-Talk Digest mode broken (1997) Roundup function? (1997)