Re: Shownext on AOL

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46963
interpreted = N
texte = >I imagine that this is why some search engines don't even bother to load pages which have parameters appended to the end of the URLs. It wastes their resources to have their bot repetitively visit the same pages again and again ...Yes. Bots are getting smarter, however. They're learning to ignore everything to the right of the ? and to avoid being caught in an infinite loop due to dynamic variables. PicBot (something like that) crawled one of my sites recently and merrily ignored all the dynamic stuff in the URL's. I think Google can do that now, too. I don't know about the others.Even so, you don't see a lot of dynamic stuff highly ranked in the search engine results, so it may be best to avoid them> >I like cookies for identifying shopping carts, but there are two problems with cookies: > >1- The browser owner can turn them off.True. When I can't detect a cookie, I replace the Add To Cart button with a note saying Turn on Your Friggin' Cookies, you twit. Click here to learn how. Or words to that effect. >2- If the reason for using a cookie is to avoid placing unique values into every URL, then the problem remains that certain browsers (and maybe certain proxy servers such as AOL's) will still cache pages they should not cache, even when no-cache tags and [setmimeheader] tags are used in an effort to prevent caching.In my personal experience, some users think of a computer the same way they think of a TV: neither requires any maintenance or updating.They don't read geek news, so they have no idea that their browser is 2-3 versions out of date or why 12 Megs of RAM simply isn't enough anymore.Glenn------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Shownext on AOL (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  2. Re: Shownext on AOL (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  3. Re: Shownext on AOL (Donovan 2003)
  4. Re: Shownext on AOL (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  5. Re: Shownext on AOL (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  6. Re: Shownext on AOL (Velma Kahn 2003)
  7. Re: Shownext on AOL (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  8. Re: Shownext on AOL (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  9. Re: Shownext on AOL (Pedro Rivera 2003)
  10. Shownext on AOL (Glenn Busbin 2003)
>I imagine that this is why some search engines don't even bother to load pages which have parameters appended to the end of the URLs. It wastes their resources to have their bot repetitively visit the same pages again and again ...Yes. Bots are getting smarter, however. They're learning to ignore everything to the right of the ? and to avoid being caught in an infinite loop due to dynamic variables. PicBot (something like that) crawled one of my sites recently and merrily ignored all the dynamic stuff in the URL's. I think Google can do that now, too. I don't know about the others.Even so, you don't see a lot of dynamic stuff highly ranked in the search engine results, so it may be best to avoid them> >I like cookies for identifying shopping carts, but there are two problems with cookies: > >1- The browser owner can turn them off.True. When I can't detect a cookie, I replace the Add To Cart button with a note saying Turn on Your Friggin' Cookies, you twit. Click here to learn how. Or words to that effect. >2- If the reason for using a cookie is to avoid placing unique values into every URL, then the problem remains that certain browsers (and maybe certain proxy servers such as AOL's) will still cache pages they should not cache, even when no-cache tags and [setmimeheader] tags are used in an effort to prevent caching.In my personal experience, some users think of a computer the same way they think of a TV: neither requires any maintenance or updating.They don't read geek news, so they have no idea that their browser is 2-3 versions out of date or why 12 Megs of RAM simply isn't enough anymore.Glenn------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Glenn Busbin

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

latest version? (1998) Founditems (1998) How To question on setting up downloads (1997) Web Merchant Docs? (2002) My X-Mas Wish (1999) insecuretextvars preference doesn't work (2000) Unix DB Permission Error (2002) [WebDNA] Virtual server (2011) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) web delivery (1997) How do I get WebCatalog to interpret WebDNA tags in.html files? (1997) WebCatalog 4.0.1 has been released! (2000) [writefile] (1997) popups, netscape vs explorer (1997) RED QUESTION MARK (1999) PC Cookie Problem? (2003) random images (1997) Multiple Pulldowns (1997) PCS Frames (1997) RE: [isfolder] and [filename] (1997)