Re: OT: javascript help
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53101
interpreted = N
texte = On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I'm using this to create my frameset with one main (top) frame and an > invisible or hidden bottom frame: > >
> > > What I'm wondering is ... does the bottom frame have to have a source > in order to be created properly? blank page - otherwise shows 404 i think... > I'm thinking that it does not, in > which case the browser will simply leave it empty -- which *should* > speed up the browser a bit. > > Does anyone know if removing the source > (src=resultsHidden.html?z=[z]) in the hidden frame will create any > problems in any browsers? > > I'm also wondering if the use of the number zero as the height of the > second frame will cause any problems in any browsers? it seems to me > that the only way to really make the second frame 'invisible' is to > set the height to zero -- but if this breaks any browsers then maybe > I should set it to "1". i have it like this written 3 - 4 years ago when there wasn't target in javascript yet:
it's kinda doing the same submitting stuff.... the top submits to the "bottom" frame.... nobody sees the bottom one.... > > Any comments or thoughts on these issues? > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I'm using this to create my frameset with one main (top) frame and an > invisible or hidden bottom frame: > > > > > What I'm wondering is ... does the bottom frame have to have a source > in order to be created properly? blank page - otherwise shows 404 i think... > I'm thinking that it does not, in > which case the browser will simply leave it empty -- which *should* > speed up the browser a bit. > > Does anyone know if removing the source > (src=resultsHidden.html?z=[z]) in the hidden frame will create any > problems in any browsers? > > I'm also wondering if the use of the number zero as the height of the > second frame will cause any problems in any browsers? it seems to me > that the only way to really make the second frame 'invisible' is to > set the height to zero -- but if this breaks any browsers then maybe > I should set it to "1". i have it like this written 3 - 4 years ago when there wasn't target in javascript yet: it's kinda doing the same submitting stuff.... the top submits to the "bottom" frame.... nobody sees the bottom one.... > > Any comments or thoughts on these issues? > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kalin Mintchev
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997)
Error Msg (1998)
multiple db's (2003)
Public beta 5 of WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000)
access denied problem (1997)
Webcatalog error, Plug-in for Webstar (1996)
[AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997)
eq (2000)
lookup and two records? (1997)
Unable to view next 101-200 (1997)
Forum - Test Request (2005)
[WC 2.1.30] Stack overflow. (2000)
Digest Version (2000)
[accountNum] and [math] (1997)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Summarizing results. Is there a shortcut? (1999)
[protect] locks out anyone (2003)
Authenticate (1997)
Templates for Customer Database? (1997)
[WebDNA] Why doesn't this returnraw redirect to the new page? (2009)