Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100653
interpreted = N
texte = You don't know that this date is not relevant. For instance, a quick Google search tells us that Krakatoa erupted in 535 A.D. Or maybe the original poster is putting together a website for things happening in the Dark Ages. >I got the same! > >When I change to %Y I got 02/27/0535 > > >Try using a more relevant date/number such as 733655 > > > > > > >On 05/09/2008, at 5:13 AM, Tim Benson wrote: > >> This line [text]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date >>%m/%d/%y]195462[/Format][/text] >> Produces >> testdate = 02/27/*+ >> >> I expected a number. >> >> tim >> >> On 9/3/08 11:15 AM, "Paul Willis" wrote: >> >>> What do you get back and what are you expecting? >>> >>> %y is the year without century so 08 at the moment >>> %Y is the year with century so 2008 at the moment >>> >>> ...or my guess is you are using this inside an [orderfile] where >>>date stuff doesn't work as normal. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 15:54, Tim Benson wrote: >>> >>>> The formatting option [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y] no longer >>>>supplies the year properly, was it replaced or no longer >>>>supported? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Timothy D. Benson (tbenson@syracusecoe.org) >>>> Information Coordinator >>>> SyracuseCoE >>>> 621 Skytop Road >>>> Syracuse, NY 13244 >>>> Tel:315-443-8756 >>>> Web:SyracuseCoe.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >--------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: -- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.com http://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation system http://TightJacket.com -- stylish protection for your laptop -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attitude is the only difference between ordeal and adventure. Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Tim Benson 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Terry Wilson 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Marc Thompson 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Marc Thompson 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Marc Thompson 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Marc Thompson 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Terry Wilson 2008)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date ("William DeVaul" 2008)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date ("William DeVaul" 2008)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Tim Benson 2008)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Paul Willis 2008)
  21. [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date (Tim Benson 2008)
You don't know that this date is not relevant. For instance, a quick Google search tells us that Krakatoa erupted in 535 A.D. Or maybe the original poster is putting together a website for things happening in the Dark Ages. >I got the same! > >When I change to %Y I got 02/27/0535 > > >Try using a more relevant date/number such as 733655 > > > > > > >On 05/09/2008, at 5:13 AM, Tim Benson wrote: > >> This line [text]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date >>%m/%d/%y]195462[/Format][/text] >> Produces >> testdate = 02/27/*+ >> >> I expected a number. >> >> tim >> >> On 9/3/08 11:15 AM, "Paul Willis" wrote: >> >>> What do you get back and what are you expecting? >>> >>> %y is the year without century so 08 at the moment >>> %Y is the year with century so 2008 at the moment >>> >>> ...or my guess is you are using this inside an [orderfile] where >>>date stuff doesn't work as normal. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 15:54, Tim Benson wrote: >>> >>>> The formatting option [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y] no longer >>>>supplies the year properly, was it replaced or no longer >>>>supported? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Timothy D. Benson (tbenson@syracusecoe.org) >>>> Information Coordinator >>>> SyracuseCoE >>>> 621 Skytop Road >>>> Syracuse, NY 13244 >>>> Tel:315-443-8756 >>>> Web:SyracuseCoe.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >--------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: -- Terry Wilson | terry@terryfic.com | http://terryfic.com http://WhosComing.com - a simplified, affordable online reservation system http://TightJacket.com -- stylish protection for your laptop -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attitude is the only difference between ordeal and adventure. Terry Wilson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

setting cookies with [setcookie] (1998) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) Getting Crazy (1998) [Sum] function? (1997) Re[2]: [shell]? (2000) [WebDNA] Date and Time as numbers (2009) [WebDNA] [WSC] WebDNA Development Summit (2014) DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997) Off Topic: Help Wanted (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Banners and sort of random display (1997) Weird problems with [SHOWIF]s (1997) Problems getting parameters passed into email. (1997) [WebDNA] Protect help... Beginner Question (2008) Re:Searching for ALL / empty form field (1997) ListVariables Problem (2003) WebCat2b12 forgets serial # (1997) inetinfo.exe (1999) Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997)