Re: [WebDNA] Format Days_To_Date
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100659
interpreted = N
texte = I found that it starts to work in the year 1000, 0999 causes problemsOn 05/09/2008, at 8:22 AM, Marc Thompson wrote:> Here's a littel test to show where it starts working, 1900:> [loop start=360&end=740062&advance=365]> [text show=t]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%Y][index][/Format] > [/text]> -> [text show=t]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y][index][/Format] > [/text]
> [/loop]>> Marc>> Stuart Tremain wrote:>> And did you notice that there is NO example of the output ????>> On 05/09/2008, at 8:01 AM, Marc Thompson wrote:>>> Incidentally, [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y]195462[/Format] comes >>> directly from the WebDNA Reference guide under>>> [Format FormatSpec]Text or Number[/Format]>>>>>> Marc>>>>>> Terry Wilson wrote:>>>> You don't know that this date is not relevant. For instance, a >>>> quick Google search tells us that Krakatoa erupted in 535 A.D.>>>> Or maybe the original poster is putting together a website for >>>> things happening in the Dark Ages.>>>>> I got the same!>>>>>>>>>> When I change to %Y I got 02/27/0535>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using a more relevant date/number such as 733655>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/09/2008, at 5:13 AM, Tim Benson wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> This line [text]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y]195462[/ >>>>>> Format][/text]>>>>>> Produces>>>>>> testdate = 02/27/*+>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected a number.>>>>>>>>>>>> tim>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/08 11:15 AM, "Paul Willis"
wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you get back and what are you expecting?>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %y is the year without century so 08 at the moment>>>>>>> %Y is the year with century so 2008 at the moment>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or my guess is you are using this inside an [orderfile] >>>>>>> where date stuff doesn't work as normal.>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 15:54, Tim Benson wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The formatting option [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y] no >>>>>>>> longer supplies the year properly, was it replaced or no >>>>>>>> longer supported?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timothy D. Benson (tbenson@syracusecoe.org)>>>>>>>> Information Coordinator>>>>>>>> SyracuseCoE>>>>>>>> 621 Skytop Road>>>>>>>> Syracuse, NY 13244>>>>>>>> Tel:315-443-8756>>>>>>>> Web:SyracuseCoe.org>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>>>> the mailing list .>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------->>> Marc Thompson>>> Software Engineer>>> Office of Information Technology>>> University of Utah>>> 801.585.9264>>> marc.thompson@utah.edu>>> ------------------------------------------->>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> -- > -------------------------------------------> Marc Thompson> Software Engineer> Office of Information Technology> University of Utah> 801.585.9264> marc.thompson@utah.edu> -------------------------------------------> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I found that it starts to work in the year 1000, 0999 causes problemsOn 05/09/2008, at 8:22 AM, Marc Thompson wrote:> Here's a littel test to show where it starts working, 1900:> [loop start=360&end=740062&advance=365]> [text show=t]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%Y][index][/Format] > [/text]> -> [text show=t]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y][index][/Format] > [/text]
> [/loop]>> Marc>> Stuart Tremain wrote:>> And did you notice that there is NO example of the output ????>> On 05/09/2008, at 8:01 AM, Marc Thompson wrote:>>> Incidentally, [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y]195462[/Format] comes >>> directly from the WebDNA reference guide under>>> [Format FormatSpec]Text or Number[/Format]>>>>>> Marc>>>>>> Terry Wilson wrote:>>>> You don't know that this date is not relevant. For instance, a >>>> quick Google search tells us that Krakatoa erupted in 535 A.D.>>>> Or maybe the original poster is putting together a website for >>>> things happening in the Dark Ages.>>>>> I got the same!>>>>>>>>>> When I change to %Y I got 02/27/0535>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using a more relevant date/number such as 733655>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/09/2008, at 5:13 AM, Tim Benson wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> This line [text]testdate=[Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y]195462[/ >>>>>> Format][/text]>>>>>> Produces>>>>>> testdate = 02/27/*+>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected a number.>>>>>>>>>>>> tim>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/3/08 11:15 AM, "Paul Willis" wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you get back and what are you expecting?>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %y is the year without century so 08 at the moment>>>>>>> %Y is the year with century so 2008 at the moment>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or my guess is you are using this inside an [orderfile] >>>>>>> where date stuff doesn't work as normal.>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 15:54, Tim Benson wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The formatting option [Format Days_To_Date %m/%d/%y] no >>>>>>>> longer supplies the year properly, was it replaced or no >>>>>>>> longer supported?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timothy D. Benson (tbenson@syracusecoe.org)>>>>>>>> Information Coordinator>>>>>>>> SyracuseCoE>>>>>>>> 621 Skytop Road>>>>>>>> Syracuse, NY 13244>>>>>>>> Tel:315-443-8756>>>>>>>> Web:SyracuseCoe.org>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>>>> the mailing list .>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------->>> Marc Thompson>>> Software Engineer>>> Office of Information Technology>>> University of Utah>>> 801.585.9264>>> marc.thompson@utah.edu>>> ------------------------------------------->>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> -- > -------------------------------------------> Marc Thompson> Software Engineer> Office of Information Technology> University of Utah> 801.585.9264> marc.thompson@utah.edu> -------------------------------------------> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:
Stuart Tremain
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Q: writefile and uploads. (1998)
WebDNA-Talk Digests (1997)
RE: Languages (1997)
That Flakey 'Brawl' thing (1997)
WebCatalog Technical Reference (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Webcatalog, Webstar and Crasharama (1999)
Apache 2.2 (2007)
SQLCONNECT (2005)
New Mac Public Beta Available (1997)
browser info.txt and SSL (1997)
Sending order notification by fax (1999)
WYSIWYG HTML editor for use in browser (2001)
Execute Applescript (1997)
Zipcodes (1998)
Further on formula.db failure to calculate shipCost (1997)
OK, my turn... TEST (2003)
Repeating Fields (1997)
Catalogs and W* (1996)
Mac Vs WindowsNT (1997)