Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102650
interpreted = N
texte = > > The interpret should not be required when that code is > > inside a search context. > > It shouldn't? No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- unless something prevents it of course ... There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so this is probably not an issue for you anyways. It must be something you're doing in the code above that search context that's preventing the tag from being interpreted normally. > The problem definitely went away when I added that > interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at > that point. I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of things anyways ... :) Sincerely, Ken Grome Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Marc Thompson 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Terry Wilson 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  16. [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
> > The interpret should not be required when that code is > > inside a search context. > > It shouldn't? No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- unless something prevents it of course ... There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so this is probably not an issue for you anyways. It must be something you're doing in the code above that search context that's preventing the tag from being interpreted normally. > The problem definitely went away when I added that > interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at > that point. I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of things anyways ... :) Sincerely, Ken Grome Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Using Currencies other than Dollars (1997) Credit Card Number checking (1997) Reversed words (1997) [WebDNA] Styling search results [using css] (2009) RE: [WebDNA] Still having problems (2008) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Math Hell! (2000) [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (2011) form data submission gets truncated (1997) Duplicate Cart ID (2001) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) WebStar Secure on other machine (1997) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) t or f (1997) Database Security (1998) [WebDNA] Calculate Cube root (2012) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Any word on upload feature? (2000) [shell] (2002)