Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103476
interpreted = N
texte = > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understandthis format, some or all of this message may not be legible.--B_3334139505_4921865Content-type: text/plain;charset="ISO-8859-1"Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printableNow that we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I a=mcurious what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS XServer v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonderwhether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control you=rcoffee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/neediTools, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat2x/Mac OS 7.x days.So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNAserver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current bestproducts and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question,here are a few current considerations:Timbuktu Pro or Apple Remote Desktop?Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel? All on the latest, maxed-outMac Mini + RAID?Thoughts? Suggestions?Thanks,-ChrisOn 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA"
wrote:> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator> wrote:>> is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage of 64 bit...?>=20> WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it runnin=g on> Snow Leopard.>=20> The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the> WebDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitation=s of> the XML components.> The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affec=ted> by apache or the OS bit level.>=20> (On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit= for> 64bit OS's.)>=20>=20--B_3334139505_4921865Content-type: text/html;charset="ISO-8859-1"Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printableRe: [WebDNA] Snow LeopardNow t=hat we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I am curi=ous what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS X Se=rver v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?
The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder wh=ether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control your c=offee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTo=ols, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Ma=c OS 7.x days.
So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA ser=ver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products =and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are =a few current considerations:Timbukt=u Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel?= All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID?
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thanks,
-Chris
On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" <jazwebdna@gmail.com> wrote=:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator =<bharrington@1choicerealty.com> wrote:
is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage o=f 64 bit...?
WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it running =on Snow Leopard.
The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the We=bDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitations of =the XML components.
The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affecte=d by apache or the OS bit level.
(On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit f=or 64bit OS's.)
--B_3334139505_4921865--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understandthis format, some or all of this message may not be legible.--B_3334139505_4921865Content-type: text/plain;charset="ISO-8859-1"Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printableNow that we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I a=mcurious what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS XServer v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonderwhether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control you=rcoffee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/neediTools, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat2x/Mac OS 7.x days.So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNAserver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current bestproducts and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question,here are a few current considerations:Timbuktu Pro or Apple Remote Desktop?Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel? All on the latest, maxed-outMac Mini + RAID?Thoughts? Suggestions?Thanks,-ChrisOn 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" wrote:> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator> wrote:>> is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage of 64 bit...?>=20> WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it runnin=g on> Snow Leopard.>=20> The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the> WebDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitation=s of> the XML components.> The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affec=ted> by apache or the OS bit level.>=20> (On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit= for> 64bit OS's.)>=20>=20--B_3334139505_4921865Content-type: text/html;charset="ISO-8859-1"Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printableRe: [WebDNA] Snow LeopardNow t=hat we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I am curi=ous what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS X Se=rver v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?
The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder wh=ether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control your c=offee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTo=ols, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Ma=c OS 7.x days.
So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA ser=ver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products =and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are =a few current considerations:Timbukt=u Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel?= All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID?
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thanks,
-Chris
On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" <jazwebdna@gmail.com> wrote=:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator =<bharrington@1choicerealty.com> wrote:
is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage o=f 64 bit...?
WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it running =on Snow Leopard.
The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the We=bDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitations of =the XML components.
The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affecte=d by apache or the OS bit level.
(On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit f=or 64bit OS's.)
--B_3334139505_4921865--
Chris Wilkinson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Search results templates (1996)
[url] issue (2000)
no global [username] or [password] displayed ... (1997)
Pricing (1998)
Function basic question (2006)
[WebDNA] Fun With WebDNA (2013)
Redirect frame targets (1998)
[AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997)
Dates (1998)
Automatic thumbnail images (1998)
Can webcat 3.0/4.0 handle 1,000,000 hits a day? (2000)
OT New use for WebCat (1998)
Date search - yes or no (1997)
[countWords]? (1997)
Serving images from databases (1998)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
forms and variables (1998)
New public beta available (1997)
Single Link browsing (1997)
WebCatalog NT (1996)