Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103945
interpreted = N
texte = Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The article will lose credibility if that stays in there. On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend > themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer science > background Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Tana Adams 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Brian Fries 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Toby Cox 2009)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  34. [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The article will lose credibility if that stays in there. On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend > themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer science > background Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

ShipTotal Yet Again (1998) Title not showing up in ViewOrder template (1998) Just made store and move file from webcatalog......... (2000) eCommerce Solution (2000) Generating unique SKU from [cart] - Still Stumped... (1997) suffix mapping, use of cache, etc. (1997) Looking for a host (1997) Searchable WebCat (etc.) Docs ? (1997) I try hard to think positively (1998) Zip Code Search (2000) Multiple prices (1997) Me know logical no need (2002) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) NT Manual (1997) [WebDNA] Advice required (2009) [WebDNA] How to code a 301 redirect (2008) Date Sorting (1997) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) Catalog Design (1999) list cookies and list http headers (1997)