Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103947
interpreted = N
texte = >> In the History section: >>> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased >> "was" should be "were" >>> set such as Object oriented programming =
>> > using the [function] and [scope] >> It's not really Object-oriented (we're not declaring classes with =20 >> embedded data and method handlers). These are more akin to =20 >> Structured Programming concepts. > > > In reading the wikipedia article on Object-oriented programming, I =20 > think we still fit in, though I agree it is not the best (or maybe =20 > traditional ) fit. I restructured the sentence noting modular =20 > programming as well. > > Particularly, read the "OOP in scripting" segment of the "Object-=20 > oriented programming" article on wikipedia. > > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 > themselves to this idea. WebDNA is a great language but it's not object-oriented in any way. Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> In the History section: >>> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased >> "was" should be "were" >>> set such as Object oriented programming = >> > using the [function] and [scope] >> It's not really Object-oriented (we're not declaring classes with =20 >> embedded data and method handlers). These are more akin to =20 >> Structured Programming concepts. > > > In reading the wikipedia article on Object-oriented programming, I =20 > think we still fit in, though I agree it is not the best (or maybe =20 > traditional ) fit. I restructured the sentence noting modular =20 > programming as well. > > Particularly, read the "OOP in scripting" segment of the "Object-=20 > oriented programming" article on wikipedia. > > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 > themselves to this idea. WebDNA is a great language but it's not object-oriented in any way. Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Christer Olsson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebDNA-Talk Digest mode broken (1997)
[ShowIf] if the varieable exists (1998)
Https not showing products (2004)
Date format problems (1997)
Not really WebCat (1997)
Emailer setup (1997)
Talk list archives down? (2003)
Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997)
sorting question... (2001)
emailer setup (1997)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
Calendar sample (1998)
[Webcat 2]Next (1997)
[SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997)
[OT] SMTP Server for W2000 (2002)
ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997)
Am I going senile? (Price recalc based on quantity) (1997)
WebCat2: Formulas.db question (1997)
Sandbox Administation (2003)
Nested search (1997)