date tag not interpreted

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35877
interpreted = N
texte = I have an admin area that sorts by date and day and year and month. As of the 3rd of last month it started interpreting the tags as follows:[date] = 08/08/2000 [date %m] = 08/08/2000%m] should be 08 [date %Y] = 08/08/2000%Y] should be 08 [date %d] = 08/08/2000%d] should be 2000Has anyone else had this problem? These tags have worked since 1998 and stopped interpreting correctly on the day we upgraded to WC 4.Thanks...---------------------------------------- - Shane P. McNelly - Senior New Media Designer - mailto:shane@ims1.com - http://www.interactiveink.com - http://www.columbusrealestate.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: date tag not interpreted (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  2. Re: date tag not interpreted (Robie Blair 2000)
  3. Re: date tag not interpreted (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  4. Re: date tag not interpreted (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  5. Re: date tag not interpreted (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  6. Re: date tag not interpreted (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  7. Re: date tag not interpreted (John Peacock 2000)
  8. Re: date tag not interpreted (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  9. Re: date tag not interpreted (John Peacock 2000)
  10. Re: date tag not interpreted (Paul Uttermohlen 2000)
  11. Re: date tag not interpreted (John Peacock 2000)
  12. Re: date tag not interpreted (Paul Uttermohlen 2000)
  13. Re: date tag not interpreted (WebDNA Support 2000)
  14. Re: date tag not interpreted (John Peacock 2000)
  15. Re: date tag not interpreted (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  16. Re: date tag not interpreted (shane@ims1.com 2000)
  17. Re: date tag not interpreted (John Peacock 2000)
  18. date tag not interpreted (shane@ims1.com 2000)
I have an admin area that sorts by date and day and year and month. As of the 3rd of last month it started interpreting the tags as follows:[date] = 08/08/2000 [date %m] = 08/08/2000%m] should be 08 [date %Y] = 08/08/2000%Y] should be 08 [date %d] = 08/08/2000%d] should be 2000Has anyone else had this problem? These tags have worked since 1998 and stopped interpreting correctly on the day we upgraded to WC 4.Thanks...---------------------------------------- - Shane P. McNelly - Senior New Media Designer - mailto:shane@ims1.com - http://www.interactiveink.com - http://www.columbusrealestate.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ shane@ims1.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

textarea (2000) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) WebDNA (WebCatalog) working with iTools 7.3 (2004) Search problems! (1999) [OT] test (2002) Cool new site (1996) Zipcodes (1998) Refering page (1998) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) line endings for Mac OS X files? (2003) upgrading (1997) [WebDNA] New list (2008) Is this a DEATH THREAT? (2002) WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997) Problems getting parameters passed into email. (1997) Thanks Grant (1997) [WebDNA] Credit card processing (2012) Pipes instead of tabs (1998) Cookies and customers with cookies turned off (2005)