[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax??

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 36398
interpreted = N
texte = Rob, (or anyone who knows the answer)I haven't tried your below code from a couple weeks ago... but assuming it does (it seems simple enough)WHY does it work?Your [math] syntax is not something I have seen documented or elsewhere.Could you elaborate? Does the technique rely on an artifact we may see dissolve in a future version of webcat (as if you knew that ;-)???-JohnIf you absolutely, positively *have* to have a non-null boolean value for a checkbox (which you don't, really : ) it's simpler to implement in WC4.-- file: checkboxesAdNauseum.html ----------
check 1
check 2
check 3
[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck2=[check2]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck3=[check3]=1[/math]check 1 = [nuCheck1]
check 2 = [nuCheck2]
check 3 = [nuCheck3]
----------------------------------The nuCheckx variables will *always* exist, and be 1 for checked, 0 if not.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (John Butler 2000)
  2. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  3. Re: [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  4. [math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] = proper syntax?? (John Butler 2000)
Rob, (or anyone who knows the answer)I haven't tried your below code from a couple weeks ago... but assuming it does (it seems simple enough)WHY does it work?Your [math] syntax is not something I have seen documented or elsewhere.Could you elaborate? Does the technique rely on an artifact we may see dissolve in a future version of webcat (as if you knew that ;-)???-JohnIf you absolutely, positively *have* to have a non-null boolean value for a checkbox (which you don't, really : ) it's simpler to implement in WC4.-- file: checkboxesAdNauseum.html ----------
check 1
check 2
check 3
[math show=f]nuCheck1=[check1]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck2=[check2]=1[/math] [math show=f]nuCheck3=[check3]=1[/math]check 1 = [nuCheck1]
check 2 = [nuCheck2]
check 3 = [nuCheck3]
----------------------------------The nuCheckx variables will *always* exist, and be 1 for checked, 0 if not.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

redirect with frames (1997) If Empty ? (1997) WebCat B13 Mac CGI -- Frames question (1997) Reindexing a db with duplicate numbers... (1999) Execute Applescript (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) weight based shipping cost questions (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] Free Windows FTP client recommendations (2009) [Switch] - works great, suggestion (2000) problems with WebCat-Plugin (1997) searchable list archive (1997) Email/Order to fax? (2003) Missing from Docs [folderName] (1997) using showpage and showcart commands (1996) Rumpus & WebCat (1998) First postarg not taking in $Commands (1997) Just made store and move file from webcatalog......... (2000) Help! WebCat2 bug (Ben's input) (1997) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) Draft Manual, Tutorial, and more (1997)