Re: search for non-unique question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2001


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40287
interpreted = N
texte = actually it can be up to 10k times 10k iterations :-)This search within search is the thing you need, Dale, however, I would put a max=1 in the INNER search, which would give you only one output for nicknames that are in there multiple times!Ciao,Peter----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Lynch To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: search for non-unique question > On a db with 10k records, wouldn't this be 20k searches? :) > > > On 11/24/01 8:59 PM, Marc@lsaproofing.com mashed the following keys : > > > This should work, although it is a nasty search as it will have to search > > the db 10,000 times less the blanks: > > > > [!]---------Search for all nicknames--------[/!] > > [Search db=your_users.db&nenicknamedata=findall&nenicknamedata=[blank]] > > [founditems] > > [!]---------Then take each nickname to research for numfound greater than > > one--------[/!] > > [Search > > db=your_users.db&eqnicknamedata=[nickname]&nicknamesort=1&nicknamesdir=as] > > [showif [numfound]>1] > > [founditems] > > [!]---------If more than one nickname is found it will display within the > > showif --------[/!] > > [nickname]
> > [/founditems] > > [/showif] > > [/search] > > > > [/founditems] > > [/search] > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/24/01 3:54 AM, Dale Therio wrote: > > > >> WebCatalog 3.0.7 on Mac OS > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a database with about 10,000 records in it. I need to > >> do a search on a specific field (nickname) and find all > >> records that have more than one match. > >> > >> What I am doing is trying to take an existing field and > >> eventually make the value in that field a unique value, so in > >> order to do that I need to find all records where there is a > >> conflict and notify those users that they will need to change > >> their nickname. > >> > >> Got any ideas on how to construct such a search? > >> > >> Oh, and many of the records currently have this field blank, I > >> will deal with those users as a seperate case. > >> > >> Thanks for any suggestions. > >> > >> Dale > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > >> the mailing list . > >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >> > >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: search for non-unique question (Brian Fries 2001)
  2. Re: search for non-unique question (Aaron Lynch 2001)
  3. Re: search for non-unique question (Brian Fries 2001)
  4. Re: search for non-unique question (Peter Werno 2001)
  5. Re: search for non-unique question (Dale Therio 2001)
  6. Re: search for non-unique question (Aaron Lynch 2001)
  7. Re: search for non-unique question (Marc@lsaproofing.com 2001)
  8. Re: search for non-unique question (Aaron Lynch 2001)
  9. search for non-unique question (Dale Therio 2001)
actually it can be up to 10k times 10k iterations :-)This search within search is the thing you need, Dale, however, I would put a max=1 in the INNER search, which would give you only one output for nicknames that are in there multiple times!Ciao,Peter----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Lynch To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: search for non-unique question > On a db with 10k records, wouldn't this be 20k searches? :) > > > On 11/24/01 8:59 PM, Marc@lsaproofing.com mashed the following keys : > > > This should work, although it is a nasty search as it will have to search > > the db 10,000 times less the blanks: > > > > [!]---------Search for all nicknames--------[/!] > > [Search db=your_users.db&nenicknamedata=findall&nenicknamedata=[blank]] > > [founditems] > > [!]---------Then take each nickname to research for numfound greater than > > one--------[/!] > > [Search > > db=your_users.db&eqnicknamedata=[nickname]&nicknamesort=1&nicknamesdir=as] > > [showif [numfound]>1] > > [founditems] > > [!]---------If more than one nickname is found it will display within the > > showif --------[/!] > > [nickname]
> > [/founditems] > > [/showif] > > [/search] > > > > [/founditems] > > [/search] > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/24/01 3:54 AM, Dale Therio wrote: > > > >> WebCatalog 3.0.7 on Mac OS > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a database with about 10,000 records in it. I need to > >> do a search on a specific field (nickname) and find all > >> records that have more than one match. > >> > >> What I am doing is trying to take an existing field and > >> eventually make the value in that field a unique value, so in > >> order to do that I need to find all records where there is a > >> conflict and notify those users that they will need to change > >> their nickname. > >> > >> Got any ideas on how to construct such a search? > >> > >> Oh, and many of the records currently have this field blank, I > >> will deal with those users as a seperate case. > >> > >> Thanks for any suggestions. > >> > >> Dale > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > >> the mailing list . > >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >> > >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Peter Werno

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: boldwords funky (1998) Re:[ShowIf] and empty fields (1997) Search Order? (2000) syntax question, not in online refernce (1997) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) WebDNA-Talk Digests (1997) [WebDNA] OT: How is this being done? Curious. (2009) User/pass with tcpconnect (2000) Bug Report, maybe (1997) New commands in Final candidate (1997) possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997) Re[2]: Re[2]: running WebCatalog under Apache on NT? (2000) Number of Feilds Passed to [append] (2000) Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) Next (1997) Calculating multiple shipping... (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) Replace context problem ... (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (2009) WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - AGAIN - (1997)