Re: I've been thinking
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 44326
interpreted = N
texte = I think this might be usefull, also since there are so many intracacies that just are not available in the given docs... This would be a good place to keep track of bugs also. The problem would be keeping it valid... We don't have a problem here on the list with that because (for instance) if I make a suggestion that either is wrong or inefficient, someone else will come in and correct it. If something was implimented that allow a vote of, lets say, 2 or more developers to get rid of someone's suggestion, that might be a way of keeping the system free of bad advice. ;-)Alain might be a good choice to build something like this also because (I'm assuming he) consistantly offers up efficient solutions.Also, I think these interactive web docs should contain a place to post solutions... (or at least a see redeyeinteractive for a free download) or something. there are a great deal of little widgets offered up that are a great resource.DonovanGary Krockover wrote:> How about doing the interactive version of the webDNA web docs, as discussed > before here, where us visitors could annotate notes to pages ala the PHP > manual. (notes, code snippets, catch-alls, pit-falls, etc). > > I actually started this project, and it's fairly simple. I was just getting > bogged down in rewriting the online docs in a non-framed version. Also, > there's a page where several global tags (maybe others) are all grouped onto > one page and are separated by a named anchor. One would want those on > individual pages for the blogging system. > > My suggestion, but has SMSI said that they are adding this with the > developers section thingy that they are working on? I need to search for > the latest on that, when is the projected launch date and is this a free > service? No, it's not, I think I know that already. Ok, my suggestion > stands, a FREE version of the interactive docs where we could annotate our > notes to it. > > GK >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I think this might be usefull, also since there are so many intracacies that just are not available in the given docs... This would be a good place to keep track of bugs also. The problem would be keeping it valid... We don't have a problem here on the list with that because (for instance) if I make a suggestion that either is wrong or inefficient, someone else will come in and correct it. If something was implimented that allow a vote of, lets say, 2 or more developers to get rid of someone's suggestion, that might be a way of keeping the system free of bad advice. ;-)Alain might be a good choice to build something like this also because (I'm assuming he) consistantly offers up efficient solutions.Also, I think these interactive web docs should contain a place to post solutions... (or at least a see redeyeinteractive for a free download) or something. there are a great deal of little widgets offered up that are a great resource.DonovanGary Krockover wrote:> How about doing the interactive version of the webDNA web docs, as discussed > before here, where us visitors could annotate notes to pages ala the PHP > manual. (notes, code snippets, catch-alls, pit-falls, etc). > > I actually started this project, and it's fairly simple. I was just getting > bogged down in rewriting the online docs in a non-framed version. Also, > there's a page where several global tags (maybe others) are all grouped onto > one page and are separated by a named anchor. One would want those on > individual pages for the blogging system. > > My suggestion, but has SMSI said that they are adding this with the > developers section thingy that they are working on? I need to search for > the latest on that, when is the projected launch date and is this a free > service? No, it's not, I think I know that already. Ok, my suggestion > stands, a FREE version of the interactive docs where we could annotate our > notes to it. > > GK >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997)
Thanks Grant (1997)
View Source from cache (1997)
using showpage and showcart commands (1996)
Free shipping (2000)
Netscape v. IE (1997)
Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (2000)
Summing fields (1997)
shipcost (1997)
UPS uber integration (2007)
Where's Cart Created ? (1997)
Include a big block of text (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997)
unsubscribe (1997)
WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997)
Looking up two prices in database? (1997)
Entry pages (was: WebCatalog MAJOR drawback) (1998)
math/text variable limits per page (2001)
WebCat2.0b15-to many nested [xx] tags (1997)
Problem searching bw & ne of a word (1999)