Re: [OT] Xserve
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 44452
interpreted = N
texte = Andrew, don't take this as a flame... I may use a certain type of system but I believe this to be a free choice. :-) Please see below for my final comments on this thread. (take them with a grain of salt.. I think is the expression)Andrew Simpson wrote:> Your missing the entire point. > > XServe is Apples top of the line server product - its meant to be the > meanest thing on the block.Xserve compared is not running 10.2 Jag.> > I put it up against the cheapest entry level workstation we could find and > the results are up for all to see.XP 2100+, 512 MB 2700DDR Ram, ATA 133 7200RPM Drive, Windows 2000 ServerIs the only Windows Machine that beat the 10.1 Xserver in your test.Is this machine the cheapest entry level workstation you are talking about? This machine is around $2000 (W2000Server is $1200 alone 10client lic.)Granted its cheaper than $3000 but it is not a rackmount ( a large value in itself)unit and may lack some of the hardware server features that the Xserve has inately.Your comment that its there for all to see is true but I don't think the results are quite what you make them out to be. ;-)> > > spend a little more money - say half the price of the xserve and it would > have well and truly had its ass kicked.Well, this would be the test wouldn't it... I would like to see results from a 10.2 Jag and some more windows (rackmount) machines. I'm really not putting down windows performance at all... I'm just reading the results of the tests. And (though I'd still buy Mac/*nix machines for other reasons) if the Windows results clearly beat the mac results, I would read them just the same...but they don't as of yet. ;-)Cheers, Donovan> > > Sorry - you still won't convince me to buy hardware based on the nice color > of the thing. > >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Andrew, don't take this as a flame... I may use a certain type of system but I believe this to be a free choice. :-) Please see below for my final comments on this thread. (take them with a grain of salt.. I think is the expression)Andrew Simpson wrote:> Your missing the entire point. > > XServe is Apples top of the line server product - its meant to be the > meanest thing on the block.Xserve compared is not running 10.2 Jag.> > I put it up against the cheapest entry level workstation we could find and > the results are up for all to see.XP 2100+, 512 MB 2700DDR Ram, ATA 133 7200RPM Drive, Windows 2000 ServerIs the only Windows Machine that beat the 10.1 Xserver in your test.Is this machine the cheapest entry level workstation you are talking about? This machine is around $2000 (W2000Server is $1200 alone 10client lic.)Granted its cheaper than $3000 but it is not a rackmount ( a large value in itself)unit and may lack some of the hardware server features that the Xserve has inately.Your comment that its there for all to see is true but I don't think the results are quite what you make them out to be. ;-)> > > spend a little more money - say half the price of the xserve and it would > have well and truly had its ass kicked.Well, this would be the test wouldn't it... I would like to see results from a 10.2 Jag and some more windows (rackmount) machines. I'm really not putting down windows performance at all... I'm just reading the results of the tests. And (though I'd still buy Mac/*nix machines for other reasons) if the Windows results clearly beat the mac results, I would read them just the same...but they don't as of yet. ;-)Cheers, Donovan> > > Sorry - you still won't convince me to buy hardware based on the nice color > of the thing. > >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
New index for docs (1997)
SetCookie / GetCookie Problem.... (2004)
session handling (2004)
redirect with frames (1997)
PowerKey and PageSentry not playing nice (2000)
[OT] Bookmarking code (2003)
RAM variables (1997)
Color options for items (1999)
looking for developers with solutions (2000)
SOP for WebDNA talk - MSNBot Crashing (2004)
Potential Conflicts? (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
[delete] problem (1997)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
This list needs a digest: rant, rave... (1997)
[WebDNA] Sorry WebDNA server not running (2014)
2 passwords (2003)
Changes to the List (1997)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)