Re: PHP and WebDNA
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 47370
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks... After posting, I thought my subject might bea little politically uncorrect for this list. (thus changingthe subject). At any rate, PHP can't beet the setup time and the preered tools forcommerce goals IMHO.about PHP image manipulation..What kind of features does this encompass? Is this likeimagemagic or pixelpipe type of stuff?about syntax... it seems that with PHP, onehas to type a bit more per command.The PHP community recommended (most portable) way:The shortest way ?> or <% %>The longest way: of course WebDNA has its XML style syn. of
but the [] just has a quality doesn't it. !? Simple and to the point.Cost of PHP is valid of course. And, there is something inspiring aboutstriving to build something very valuable (which is very possible) out ofsomething that costs nothing (or very little).For me, It will take a good amount of time before I will be at the practicaldevelopment level with PHP/mySQL/Apache that I am with WebDNA.Compiling, updating, permissions troubleshooting, security, command line,coding time etc.. can all take away from design and the big idea and thedeadlines of a site and a sites functions. So, I think WebDNA has its place.Thanks for the comments,Donovancharles kline wrote:>Don't get me wrong, I LOVE WebDNA... Been using it for many a year and have>done some really cool projects with it. I do have to say I have been using>PHP now pretty regularly for about 8 months and have found it to be a very>nice language. Yes it is free, and if you want to do anything in PHP you>will need to build it yourself.. There are no automatic shopping cart>features like WebDNA. It does support a bunch of things which WebDNA does>not at this time. XML, Arrays, Classes, Function, Sessions, Graphic>manipulation and creation, OOP. There is also a bunch of folks using Fusebox>(http://www.fusebox.org) methodologies with PHP - and that is a really big>one for me.>>PHP is a whole lot like C. It is a programming language not a markup>language like WebDNA (and ColdFusion). I will continue to use WebDNA,>especially for shopping cart stuff, but with the speed that PHP is growing,>I think it is pretty important to know... At least a little bit.>>- Charles>> >-- -Donovan Brooke-Administrator of IT /-Assc. Art Director-Creative Services-Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.342.1169 X297-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Thanks... After posting, I thought my subject might bea little politically uncorrect for this list. (thus changingthe subject). At any rate, PHP can't beet the setup time and the preered tools forcommerce goals IMHO.about PHP image manipulation..What kind of features does this encompass? Is this likeimagemagic or pixelpipe type of stuff?about syntax... it seems that with PHP, onehas to type a bit more per command.The PHP community recommended (most portable) way:The shortest way ?> or <% %>The longest way: of course WebDNA has its XML style syn. of but the [] just has a quality doesn't it. !? Simple and to the point.Cost of PHP is valid of course. And, there is something inspiring aboutstriving to build something very valuable (which is very possible) out ofsomething that costs nothing (or very little).For me, It will take a good amount of time before I will be at the practicaldevelopment level with PHP/mySQL/Apache that I am with WebDNA.Compiling, updating, permissions troubleshooting, security, command line,coding time etc.. can all take away from design and the big idea and thedeadlines of a site and a sites functions. So, I think WebDNA has its place.Thanks for the comments,Donovancharles kline wrote:>Don't get me wrong, I LOVE WebDNA... Been using it for many a year and have>done some really cool projects with it. I do have to say I have been using>PHP now pretty regularly for about 8 months and have found it to be a very>nice language. Yes it is free, and if you want to do anything in PHP you>will need to build it yourself.. There are no automatic shopping cart>features like WebDNA. It does support a bunch of things which WebDNA does>not at this time. XML, Arrays, Classes, Function, Sessions, Graphic>manipulation and creation, OOP. There is also a bunch of folks using Fusebox>(http://www.fusebox.org) methodologies with PHP - and that is a really big>one for me.>>PHP is a whole lot like C. It is a programming language not a markup>language like WebDNA (and ColdFusion). I will continue to use WebDNA,>especially for shopping cart stuff, but with the speed that PHP is growing,>I think it is pretty important to know... At least a little bit.>>- Charles>> >-- -Donovan Brooke-Administrator of IT /-Assc. Art Director-Creative Services-Epsen Hillmer Graphics-402.342.1169 X297-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[getchars] questions (1997)
Self Signed SSL Certificate (2005)
Nested searches (1998)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
boldwords funky (1998)
WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997)
'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997)
[WebDNA] Use of Linux commandline (2013)
Simple way to create unique SKU (1997)
F3 crashing server (1997)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
Me know logical no need (2002)
SMS to WebDNA (2007)
[WebDNA] numTDsPerTR_onTheFly (2010)
[WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (2009)
Missing something simple?? (1998)
A question on sub-categories (1997)
autocommit problem (1998)
carriage returns in data (1997)
Emailer (WebCat2) (1997)