Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49580
interpreted = N
texte = hmm, I've only had the chance to do brief searching around...It seems when referring to Mime Headers one is referring to what the server is able to send??I'm not sure that they can't be called the same in some cases.. for example, I've seen (in my brief searches) mention of Expires Mime Header sent by the server. I've also seen mention of the Expires Meta-Tag overriding the Mime headers.??However, I can't say that I have any more clear understanding.Guess I'll have to do more searching tomarrow. (not enough hours in the day)Thanks, Donovan Charles Kline wrote:> Just my impression really. There was a big discussion on this very > list, oh I don't know - maybe 2 months or so ago about it and that > seemed to me to be the consensus. > > - ck > > On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 06:48 PM, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > > > Charles what makes you think Meta-Tags are useless these days? > > > > Matt > > > > Charles Kline wrote: > > > >> Meta-Tags as far as I can tell are pretty useless these days in > >> regards to search engine ranking, but who knows... > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
hmm, I've only had the chance to do brief searching around...It seems when referring to Mime Headers one is referring to what the server is able to send??I'm not sure that they can't be called the same in some cases.. for example, I've seen (in my brief searches) mention of Expires Mime Header sent by the server. I've also seen mention of the Expires Meta-Tag overriding the Mime headers.??However, I can't say that I have any more clear understanding.Guess I'll have to do more searching tomarrow. (not enough hours in the day)Thanks, Donovan Charles Kline wrote:> Just my impression really. There was a big discussion on this very > list, oh I don't know - maybe 2 months or so ago about it and that > seemed to me to be the consensus. > > - ck > > On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 06:48 PM, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > > > Charles what makes you think Meta-Tags are useless these days? > > > > Matt > > > > Charles Kline wrote: > > > >> Meta-Tags as far as I can tell are pretty useless these days in > >> regards to search engine ranking, but who knows... > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan home EHG
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Searching multiple Databases (1997)
WebCat for Unix?? (1997)
Copyright that puppy (1998)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
Multiple Users.db Possible? (1997)
Nested search index (2000)
WebCatalog Technical Reference (1997)
Menu to select product variations (1997)
[WebDNA] Putting '&search' into URL killing all search (2010)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
HELP!!! (1998)
[WebDNA] DNA suffix (2008)
Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
[WebDNA] Issue with including functions (2011)
case number with spaces. (2000)
dos performance (1998)
StackOverflow, WAS: [WebDNA] get vs post problems (2011)
Bug? (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)