Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49608
interpreted = N
texte = Donovan wrote: >> The server www.ehg.net is not necessarily going to be cacheable by >> browsers or caching devices, because it is not sending all of the >> possible MIME headers. > > > You had to use a site that I haven't really touched in *years* (since > W*2.1 actually) for an example. ;-)I wasn't going to say anything. I just chose the domain you use for your e-mail address...>> http://www.searchenginewatch.com/ > > > couldn't find much info in the free area on Mime headers though > (scoured it yesterday). > Because the MIME headers are of almost no interest to the search engines, except so far as the page's cacheability determines whether the the spider thinks the site is composed of active or static pages.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (John Peacock 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (Donovan 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (John Peacock 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (Donovan home EHG 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (Charles Kline 2003)
  6. [OT] Mime Headers / Meta-Tags (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
Donovan wrote: >> The server www.ehg.net is not necessarily going to be cacheable by >> browsers or caching devices, because it is not sending all of the >> possible MIME headers. > > > You had to use a site that I haven't really touched in *years* (since > W*2.1 actually) for an example. ;-)I wasn't going to say anything. I just chose the domain you use for your e-mail address...>> http://www.searchenginewatch.com/ > > > couldn't find much info in the free area on Mime headers though > (scoured it yesterday). > Because the MIME headers are of almost no interest to the search engines, except so far as the page's cacheability determines whether the the spider thinks the site is composed of active or static pages.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Searching (2000) [slightly OT] WebCat vs. WebObjects ;) (2000) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Server replication (1998) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) International Orders (1998) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (2008) Re:Copyright ? (1997) Oops, my mistake - (was Bad suffix error) (1997) What am I missing (1997) View Source from cache (1997) Not really WebCat- (1997) Grep support request for SMSI ... (2003) Insert Line Feed Character (2004) [showif]/[hideif] question (1997) Putting & into a database (1999)