Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103036
interpreted = N
texte = > [snip]>> D.,>> thanks for your reply.>> The db's would be hit alot. The site is based on a kind of search >> engine model. The searches would be narrowed by geography and then >> further narrowed by topic, subtopic1, subtopic2, ...>> How are the [SQL] tags holding up in production for you guys using >> them?>> Any more feedback, and by anyone, would be really >> appreciated! ... I am the responsible guy on this point and the >> truth is I have no experience with monstrous db's like this.>> -Thanks>> -G>>> Don't use the [sql] tag, use the newer ([sqlconnect] etc) tags/ > contexts.>> (we should probably deprecate the [sql] tag and change it> to [odbc] or something more appropriate.. because that is what> it is and it is confusing.> The new MySQL tags/contexts work just fine in our tests so far.> This is an area we have started to look into more deeply. We haven't > tested large databases> yet, but joins and other (slightly complicated) MySQL queries have > proved> to work great and as expected. It is required to learn about MySQL> of course when using these newer contexts.>> We will get into even deeper testing of these contexts> in the near future, but from what I've seen so far, I'm not fearful of> recommending it's use.>> DonovanOK, thanks!It looks like we may help test it then! ;-)
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Govinda 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Govinda 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Govinda 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Patrick McCormick 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Govinda 2009)
- [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (Govinda 2009)
|
> [snip]>> D.,>> thanks for your reply.>> The db's would be hit alot. The site is based on a kind of search >> engine model. The searches would be narrowed by geography and then >> further narrowed by topic, subtopic1, subtopic2, ...>> How are the
[SQL] tags holding up in production for you guys using >> them?>> Any more feedback, and by anyone, would be really >> appreciated! ... I am the responsible guy on this point and the >> truth is I have no experience with monstrous db's like this.>> -Thanks>> -G>>> Don't use the
[SQL] tag, use the newer (
[SQLconnect] etc) tags/ > contexts.>> (we should probably deprecate the
[SQL] tag and change it> to [
ODBC] or something more appropriate.. because that is what> it is and it is confusing.> The new MySQL tags/contexts work just fine in our tests so far.> This is an area we have started to look into more deeply. We haven't > tested large databases> yet, but joins and other (slightly complicated) MySQL queries have > proved> to work great and as expected. It is required to learn about MySQL> of course when using these newer contexts.>> We will get into even deeper testing of these contexts> in the near future, but from what I've seen so far, I'm not fearful of> recommending it's use.>> DonovanOK, thanks!It looks like we may help test it then! ;-)
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat for Unix?? (1997)
A simple email page? (1999)
Empty Shopping Carts? (1998)
searching more then one (1999)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
authenticate (1999)
Your Pay (2004)
WebCatalog Upgrade Pricing? (1997)
WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
Banner DNA (1997)
Solution: Replace/Commit not Replacing/Commiting (2000)
RePost: NAT and the CART (1999)
Applescript error (1998)
Using Communigate Pro on Mac OS X Server (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)
Problems with [Search] param - Mac Plugin b15 (1997)
webcat feature request (1997)
New servers and new inline cache (1997)
Emailer & IMail List Server (1998)